# submitted to the Court properly and promptly despite C.L.No. 88/Admn. (B), dated June

- **Citation:** C.L.No. 88/Admn
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1974-06-01
- **Case number:** C.L.No. 88/Admn
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/submitted-to-the-court-properly-and-promptly-despite-c-l-no-88-admn-b-dated-june-163629
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

357
submitted to the Court properly and promptly despite C.L.No. 88/Admn. (B), dated June
1, 1974 and C.L. No.32, dated 22.5.1984. The Hon'ble Court has taken a serious view of
the matter.
I am, therefore, to request you to kindly look into the matter personally and direct
the Chief Judicial Magistrates to enter all process and orders issued by the Hon'ble Court
in the process register maintained in their offices and it shall be their personal
responsibility to ensure that due compliance is made and timely information is sent to this
Court.
(ii)
Compliance of the Judicial Orders of the High Court and Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Criminal Cases
C.L. No.10 dated March 1, 1996
It has been brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Court that subordinate Courts who
have passed a sentence of convictions are not often issuing the conviction warrants when
the criminal appeal or criminal revisions preferred against their orders are dismissed.
Attention of all the Officers is drawn to provision contained in Section 418 Cr. P.C.,
Rules 24 & 97 of General Rules (Criminal) and C.L. No. 88/Admn. (B), dated 1.6.1974.
Kindly impress upon all the officers working under you that compliance of the
orders of superior Courts in such matters shall be their personal responsibility. The Court
shall take a serious view in case of default reported to the Court.
Compliance of the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court issued in WP (Civil) No.
1128 of 1986 - Common Cause, A Registered Society v. Union of India & Others.
(Published in J.T. 1996 (4) SC 701)
C.L.No.31/VIIIb-287 Admin ̳G' Section Dated June 12, 1996
While enclosing a copy of order passed in the aforesaid Writ Petition, I am
directed to intimate you that the directions contained in the above mentioned order of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court, be strictly complied with.
 I am, therefore, to request you that the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
be communicated to all the Criminal courts in the Judgeship for strict compliance and
such compliance report be submitted to the court within three months from the date of
receipt of this communication.
(iii)
Compliance of the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in
criminal appeal no.82 of 1995 - Bani Singh and others v. State of U.P.
C.L.No.65/ Admin: (G) Dated 02 Dec., 1996.
While enclosing a copy of the judgment dated 9.7.1996 passed in the aforesaid
criminal Appeal reported in Judgment Today (1996 (6) S.C.287. I am directed to
communicate you and all the officers posted in the judgeship that directions given in the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court be complied with so that the administration of
Criminal Justice may be toned up.
I am, therefore to direct you that the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court be
brought to the knowledge of the officers posted in the Judgeship for strict compliance.
358
(See for Judgment AIR SC 2429)
(iv)
Compliance of the direction of the Supreme Court issued in writ petition
(Civil) No. 1128 of 1986 - Common Cuse v. Union of India and others-J.T. 1996(4)
S.C. 701
C.L.No. 11/VIIIb-287/Admin (G)/Dated: Alld: March 17, 1997
In continuation of the court's C.L.No.31/VIIIb-287 Dated 12.6.1996 and
C.L.No.43/VIIIb-287 dated 6.8.1996, I am directed to intimate you that the directions
made in the abovementioned orders of the Supreme Court has been modified by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 28.11.1996, the copy of the modified order is
enclosed herewith for strict compliance.
 I am, therefore, to request you that the directions contained in the modified
order be communicated to all the criminal courts of your judgeship, for strict compliance.
(See for Judgment 1996 6 S.C. C. 775)
(v)
Compliance of the direction of Hon'ble Supreme Court contained in
Judgment rendered in Criminal Appeal No.1045/98, Raj Deo Sharma Vs. the
state of Bihar.
C.L.No.61/dated; Allahabad: 17th November, 1998

The Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding the aforesaid Criminal Appeal has
issued direction to be followed by the Criminal Courts particularly sessions courts and
special courts of India.
By enclosing the copy of the judgment, I am directed to communicate you that the
directions contained in the said judgment be brought to the notice of all the criminal
courts for strict compliance.
(See for Judgment: 1999 (39) A.C.Cr. 665)
(vi)
Citing of the ruling of Hon'ble Supreme Court and High Court.
C.L.No.18/Dated: Allahabad: 19/8/1999.

 It has come to the notice of the court that the decisions/rulings cited at the bar in
the cases before the subordinate to courts are not referred in the Judgments/orders given
by the Judicial officers, subordinate to the High Court. The court has taken a serious
stock of this situation. Under Rule 6 of General Rules (Civil), it is obligatory on the part
of the Judicial Officers to follow the ruling of the High Court and of Apex Court. This
alone is not sufficient for them to extract a sentence here and there from the Judgment
referred at Bar and to build upon it. Enunciation of the reasons or the principal on which
a question before the court is to be decided, must also bear the reference of the cases cited
for and against by the parties on the subject and should not only refer facts but also refer
the law cited on the point in issue from the side of the Bar.
 I am, therefore directed to communicate you that the Laws laid down by the High
Court and the Apex Court and referred by the Advocates should be followed and their
reference should be made in the judgments.