# the book from the Institute of Judicial Training and Research, 1/19, Vishwas Khan-1

- **Citation:** C.L. No.75/Ixd-17/Admn.(G)
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1990-08-17
- **Case number:** C.L. No.75/Ixd-17/Admn.(G)
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/the-book-from-the-institute-of-judicial-training-and-research-1-19-vishwas-khan-163048
- **Pages:** 3

## Text

113
Agarwal, Additional Registrar, High Court, Allahabad, on the above subject and to say
that the Court has approved the proposal of the Director of the Institute and direct that
you may kindly depute a special messenger (preferably a Class IV employee) to receive
the book from the Institute of Judicial Training and Research, 1/19, Vishwas Khan-1,
Gomtinagar, Lucknow*, for being distributed amongst every Judicial Officer posted in
each judgeship.

I am to add that the special messenger so deputed may be informed about the
strength of Judicial Officers in your judgeship so that the Institute be able to handover
him as many books as are required for a judgeship. After distribution of books amongst
the Officers, a receipt in token be obtained from them, which shall be forwarded to the
Institute immediately thereafter.

Kindly comply as mentioned in the letter.
44.
FIRE
C.L. No.75/Ixd-17/Admn.(G) dated August 17, 1990

I am directed to invite your attention to Rule 637 of the General Rules (Civil),
1957, Volume I, and the guidelines to be observed in the matter of Fire in the Civil
Courts which are contained in Appendix 21 of the General Rules (Civil), 1957, Volume
II, and to say that you may see that the directions issued by the Government and by Court
in the matte of fire are strictly followed and the maintenance and service of extinguishers
are made periodically.
45.
ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF EXPERIENCE TO ADVOCATES
C.L. No. 15/Admn.(F) dated March 24, 1995.

The Hon'ble Chief Justice and Judges have been pleased to direct that the District
Judges shall not issue certificates of experience to any Advocate without verifying
whether such Advocate is in fact practicing in the Judgeship.
46.
RESERVATION OF CIRCUIT HOUSE/ INSPECTION HOUSE/ OTHER
GOVERNMENT ACCOMMODATION TO HON'BLE JUDGES
C.L.No.1/ dated: Allahabad: January8, 1998.
 I am directed to circulate the directions given by Hon'ble court in contempt petition
No.13 of 1995-state of U.P.Vs.Satyajit Thakur in the matter of reservation of circuit
House /Inspection House/ other Government Accommodation to Hon'ble Judges. Those
directions relevant to the extent are extracted here in under:
―In our considered view as the chief Justice of the High court is equal in statuses
to that of the Chief Minister and the Judges of this court are equal in status to that of a
cabinet Ministers of the state and not of the State Minister's of the state.‖
―We, accordingly direct the State of U.P. to make suitable amendments to
G.O's/Rules in light of our conclusion, in regard to precedence and allotments of its
accommodation where-ever available and till then to provide accommodation to the

* Present address- Vineet Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
114
Chief Justice and Judges of this court keeping this very principle in mind. It is also
relevant to remember that the allotment rules governing the allotment of accommodation
in Circuit Houses provides that in case of the availability of a V.V.I.P. room the same
could be allotted to other dignitaries in order of seniority but in case it is required for
the President/Vice President/ Prime Minister of India, in that event it has to be vacated
by the dignitary occupying the said room; this shows that except the aforesaid three
V.V.I.P. dignitaries the room allotted to the other dignitaries need not be vacated by
them. It is, however, clarified that if there is only one room/ suit available in a
Government accommodation, which is under occupation of the chief Justice or Judge of
this court and any Constitutional Authority Higher in rank is to be provided that very
accommodation, in that event the accommodation has to be vacated and the chief justice
and Judges, as the case may be are to be accommodated in some other suitable
accommodation by the State or its authorities. This situation, however, is likely to arise
in a rare case but a workable solution has to be found out to avoid anyone's
embarrassment and we hope and trust this case be found out by the bureaucracy of this
State.‖
 Hon'ble court has also taken into consideration Government Letter
No.3796/23-8-97-178 C.P.-96 dated 9.1.1997, directing to the Engineer-in -chief P.W.D.
for ensuring reservation also in the name of dignitaries whether retired, so that they are
not put to any inconvenience. In this regard following directions were issued by the
Hon'ble court.
―We hope and trust and reiterate that all concerned in this state concerning allotment of
accommodations in the Circuit House /Inspection Bungalows /any other Government
Accommodations in this State /concerning this state situated anywhere in the country
shall henceforth follow the aforementioned directions and the Government order
aforementioned strictly and if they violate or even attempt to violate, the District Judge of
this State or any other authority or the person concerned, who comes to know of the dilly-
dallying of the authority concerned shall report the matter to be Registrar of this Court for
taking appropriate action against such a delinquent person/authority, apart from
communicating that fact immediately to the Chief Secretary of this State to take
immediate appropriate disciplinary action against the delinquent person/authority who in
addition shall secure immediately an appropriate accommodation for such visiting
dignitary.

―We hope and trust that an early action by the executive will stay at rest separate
this unfortunate controversy at the earliest. We also need to mention that word punisne
Judge in the protocol rule is somewhat a misplaced expression. The word puisne means
inferior. this expression has not been used in the Constitution. The Judges of this court
while discharging their Constitutional functions are not inferior and the Chief Justice is
only first amongst equals though undoubtedly he is the administrative head of the High
Court and master of the roster of the Judges.
―Court further held that even an attempt to obstruct or interfere with the due
administration of Justice by the Judges of this Court amounts to gross contempt of court.
115
According to the decision of the Government taken in 1984 the Judge of this
Court figure as against serial No.4 whereas the Chief Minister of Delhi figured at Serial
No.8.
You are, therefore, requested to communicate the aforementioned direction to all
concerned.
47.
ISSUE OF IDENTITY CARDS TO CIVIL COURTS' STAFF AND TO
ADVOCATES' CLERKS
C.L.No.32 /98 Dated 20th August, 1998
 It has come to the notice of the court that persons not on the roll of the
subordinate courts are found handling the judicial records. Such situation can not be
permitted to continue for long. The matter came for consideration in the Administrative
Conference held recently. The Hon ̳ble Court has taken a decision that for enforcing
better behavior from the civil courts staff, all the employees of the subordinate courts
should bear badges indicating their names. The Advocate's clerks must have an Identity
card with photograph duly stamped and signed by the District Judge or his nominee. The
Advocate's clerks, not possessing the Identity card be not permitted to enter the offices
of the subordinate courts.
 I am, therefore directed to communicate that the aforesaid directions of the
Hon'ble Court may be brought to the notice of all concerned and be strictly complied
with.
48.
PRINTING OF SALEABLE AND NON SALEABLE FORMS AND
REGISTERS USED IN THE CIVIL COURTS
C.L.No.34 /98 Dated 20th August, 1998
 The Hon'ble court has noticed the non-supply and short supply of registers,
saleable and non-saleable forms by the Superintendent, Printing and Stationery, U.P.
Allahabad. The Court has taken a decision that the District Judges initially will indent for
the supply of registers and forms to the Superintendent, Printing & Stationery. In case the
superintendent, Printing and Stationery, does not supply the required quantity then the
District Judge can get these forms etc. printed locally and the payment of the charges of
such printing and paper be made from the deposition funds. The District Judges are
further directed that they will submit a proposal of Rs. 5000/- in their annual budget to
meet such exigencies.
I am, therefore, directed to communicate you the direction of the Hon'ble Court
for compliance.
49.
ATTACHMENT OF P.C.S. (EXECUTIVE) AND I.A.S. PROBATIONERS
WITH THE DISTRICT COURTS FOR TAKING TRAINING.
C.L. No. 6/Admin.A-3 Sec Dated: 30th March, 1999
 I am directed to say that the court has been pleased to order that P.C.S.
(Executive) and I.A.S. Probationers be attached and allowed to attend the Courts with the
District Courts for taking training as and when the training programme is received by you
from the Government or by the District Magistrates concerned.