# the Government under intimation, to the Court in the prescribed proforma

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 24/Ve-58
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1974-02-18
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 24/Ve-58
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/the-government-under-intimation-to-the-court-in-the-prescribed-proforma-162916
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

77
C.L. No. 24/Ve-58 dated 18th February, 1974
(19)
A report regarding the progress and result of corruption proceedings against nongazetted officials of the subordinate courts should be submitted annually direct to
the Government under intimation, to the Court in the prescribed proforma.
C.L. No. 48/Ve-58 dated 11th May, 1978
The District Judges should implement following recommendations of the
Committee for purposes of investigation into the causes of corruption in the subordinate
courts. While implementing these recommendations, where necessary, action should also
be taken under the relevant provisions in the General Rules (Civil): -
(i)
Drastic action should be taken against the clerks of the lawyers who work
as such in the district courts without getting themselves registered with the
District Judge.
(ii)
Action should be taken against lawyers also employing unregistered
clerks.
(iii)
District officers should keep watch on the activities of unscrupulous
petition writers and typists sitting in the court compound.
C.L. No. 79/Admn.(D), dated 1st August, 1978
The Presiding Officers and the officer-in-charge, Amins should keep strict
supervision and control over the Amins and their work. And whenever there is a
complaint of corruption against an Amin, it should be enquired into promptly and if
found correct, the Amin should be given deterrent punishment.
C.L. No. 83/Ve-58, dated 28th October, 1980 as modified by
C.L. No. 85/Ve-58 Admn. (G), dated 26th December, 1981
After considering the recommendations of the Committee for Investigation of
Causes of Corruption in the Subordinate Courts in U.P., the following instructions should
be strictly adhered to and complied with.
Periodical seminar - A periodical seminar on legal topics should be organised in
which besides judicial officers, members of the Bar should also be invited to participate.
Minor technical mistakes .- As far as possible the Munsarim should get minor
omissions and technical mistakes rectified by the ^party immediately instead of obtaining
orders of the Presiding Officer asking the party to make the necessary corrections.
Service of Process - Process servers' reports should be examined immediately on
their receipt from the Nazarat and if there is no proper service, an attempt should be made
to have another service affected provided the second attempt can be completed before the
date fixed.
Recording of statements under section 200 Cr.P.C.- All the statements under
section 200 Cr.P.C. should be recorded by the magistrates themselves and should not be
left to the clerks of the office or the Court. The practice of getting the statements under
section 200 Cr.P.C. recorded by the clerks and merely putting signatures on them by the
magistrates should cease forthwith.
78
Registration of Cases. - Cases received in the magistrates courts should be
registered the same day or latest by the next day.
Monthly meeting of all the Presiding Officers of Civil and Criminal Courts .-
Once in two or three months the President and the Secretary of the District Bar
Association should also be invited to the monthly meeting of the Presiding Officers for
discussing matters touching the Bench and the Bar.
13.
INQUIRY BY ANTI-CORRUPTION BRANCH OF THE POLICE
C. L. No. 4328, dated 24th August, 1940
(1)
The Anti-Corruption Branch of the Police Department is an investigating agency
and shall take proceedings only on the written request of the prescribed authority
as defined in these rules. Any application or complaint received from other
sources shall be forwarded to the prescribed authority with or without comment.
(2)
If for any reason the Anti-Corruption Officer considers that his branch cannot or
should not undertake any inquiry which he has been asked to undertake by a
prescribed authority other than the Government, he shall after taking the orders of
the Inspector General of Police, make a report to the prescribed authority to that
effect. If after consideration of that report the prescribed authority considers that
the enquiry should be made, he may refer the matter to Government for orders.
(3)
The Anti-Corruption Branch shall keep the prescribed authority informed of the
progress of any inquiry undertaken by it from time to time and shall, when the
inquiry is complete or when requested to do so by the prescribed authority, close
the inquiry and submit a report, to that authority. It is for the prescribed authority
to decide the action, if any, that should be taken on the report of the AntiCorruption Branch.
(4)
If, during the course of an inquiry the Anti-Corruption Branch receives any
information against an officer into whose conduct it has not been requested to
inquire it shall forward the information to the prescribed authority who may, if it
sees fit, request the Branch to inquire into the matter.
(5)
If, during the course of an enquiry into the misconduct, of an officer, the AntiCorruption Branch receives any further information of misconduct by that officer
not covered by the written instructions referred to in rule I, it shall send such
information to the prescribed authority who shall pass such orders on it as it may
deem fit.
(6)
(i)
In cases in which the head of the department is not the prescribed
authority that authority shall send copies of all orders passed by it to the head of
the department and the Anti-Corruption Officer shall submit his final report and
his interim report through the head of the department and the Anti-Corruption
Officer shall submit his final report and his interim report through the head of the
department.
(ii)
For the purposes of this rule only the following shall be considered heads
of departments :
The High Court in the case of gazetted judicial officers.
* * * *