# the Judgeship for information

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 58/IVf-67
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1918-02-06
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 58/IVf-67
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/the-judgeship-for-information-162062
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

74
request you to circulate the above corrigendum amongst the Judicial Officers posted in
the Judgeship for information.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Office of the First National Judicial Pay Commission Bangalore - 560009
CORRIGENDUM
No. FNJPC/PRN/18/99

Date 7th December, 1999
Corrigendum to the Report of the First National Judicial Pay Commission.
In Chapter X of Vol. II, in paragraph 10.118, the Commission recommended that
10% of cadre strength in District Judges be given Super Time Scale to those who have
put in minimum number of three years in the cadre of Selection Grade.
However, in page 4 of the "Draft Judicial Service Rules" prepared by the
Commission and Annexed to Chapter X of Vol. II in rule 3 sub rule (5) it is inadvertently
mentioned that "holders of 10% of the number of Selection Grade District Judges and
who have put in not less than three years of service as Selection Grade District Judges in
the cadre shall be granted Super Time scale of Pay........" This ought to be l0 % of cadre
strength and not 10% ofthe posts of Selection Grade District Judges.
Therefore, it has become necessary to issue the corrigendum as below:
Existing
To be read as
"Holders of 10% of the number of Selection
Grade District Judges and who have put in not
less than 3 years of service as Selection Grade
District Judges in the cadre shall be granted
Super Time Scale...."
"10% of the cadre strength in District Judges
and who have put in not less than 3 years of
service as Selection Grade District Judges in
the cadre shall be granted Super Time Scale..."
Sd/- Justice A. B. Murgod (Retd.)
 Member Secretary
[10] PENSIONS
G.L. No. 402/46-24-29 dated 18th February, 1918
The full pension admissible to an officer of the State Judicial Service is liable to
reduction unless his services have been really approved.
Each District Judge is responsible for seeing that the rules as explained in G.O. no.
345/X-235-17, dated February 6, 1918 are brought to the notice of all ministerial Officers
in his judgeship.
C.L. No. 58/IVf-67 dated 28th August, 1981
Invites attention to G.O. No. Sa-3-11-85/X-927/80, dated 11.11.1980 regarding
prompt payment of the amount of family pension and gratuity to the family of the
Government Officers, in case of their death.
All the Judicial Officers are required to send, to the Accountant General III, U.P.,
G.A. 8-Section, Allahabad directly, the nomination forms for :
(i)
Family pension on Form - F
(ii)
D.C.R.G. on form-H.
75
11.
TRAVELLING ALLOWANCE:
(i)
Journey by road
C.L. No, 20/Xb-13 dated 15th March, 1965
G.O. no. G-2-1859/X-609-1958, dated May 4, 1962, permits road journeys between
stations connected by rail only in exceptional circumstances in the public interest. It
enjoins upon every Government servant, unless he is his own controlling officer, before
undertaking a journey by road between such stations, to obtain prior written permission
of his controlling officer for undertaking the car journey and in cases of urgency where
journey by road has been undertaken without taking prior approval of the controlling
officer, to obtain such permission invariably immediately after the journey has been
performed and in any case not later than the date on which the controlling officer
countersigns the travelling allowance bill pertaining to the road journey in question.
C.L. No.l5/Xb-13 dated 28th January, 1969
Road journeys between stations connected by rail should be undertaken only in
exceptional circumstances when it is overwhelmingly in public interest and that also with
prior permission of the controlling officer. In cases of urgency, however, where it is not
possible to obtain prior permission, such permission should invariably be taken
immediately after the said journey or at least before the T.A. bill for that journey is
countersigned. It has also to be seen that such journeys do not become too frequent or a
source of profit. Where a journey is undertaken for inspection of sub-ordinate offices or
for holding courts, the visits should be fully utilised for the purpose for which it is
undertaken and should not be such as may come to be labelled as waste of public money
and time.
C.L. No. 43/Xb-l3 dated 21st April, 1969
The District Judges who wish to perform journey by road between stations
connected by railway may do so, but T.A. in such cases should be calculated as if the
journey was performed by railunless mileage allowance calculated by road is less than
the railway fare.
C.L. No. 42/X-b-13 dated 20th July, 1982
The District Judges may travel in their own motor cars in connection with
inspection of, and other official works in, the out-lying courts in their Judgeships and
charge T.A. for travelling by road as permissible under the rules without prior permission
of the Court. So far as journey outside their jurisdiction is concerned, they should travel
by railway-trains, if the place to be visited is connected by rail with the headquarters of
the District Judge, but, if the circumstances so demand, they should obtain prior
permission of the Court to travel in their own cars to visit a place outside their
jurisdiction.
C.L. No. 14/Xb-13 dated 25th January, 1971
While submitting T.A. bills, pertaining to journeys performed in connection with
the hearing of part-heard sessions trials, for the countersignatures of the Hon‟ble the
Administrative Judge, the following information should invariably be furnished :