# the same case and if so in what amount

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 82/VIIb-47
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1972-08-08
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 82/VIIb-47
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/the-same-case-and-if-so-in-what-amount-163341
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

232
(i)
The surety may be required to file an affidavit showing details of his

property, movable and immovable, and its value indicating clearly

whether he has stood surety in any other case or for any other accused in

the same case and if so in what amount.
(ii)
When a lawyer appearing for the accused in the case verifies the status of

the surety in any amount, further verification may not be insisted upon.
(iii)
The practice of sending surety bonds to Tahsil for verification is to be

discontinued forthwith.
C.L. No. 82/VIIb-47, dated 8th August, 1972

Directions regarding verification of surety bonds should be complied with
strictly. It is the personal responsibility of District Judges to see that the directions are
carried out in true spirit
C.L. No.145/VIIb-47 , dated 19th December, 1978

Likewise, before releasing an accused on bail a declaration should be obtained
from the surety to the effect that, apart from the case in which he is standing as a surety,
he has not stood as a surety in any other case or otherwise he should indicate in which
and in how many other cases and for which accused person or persons he has stood
surety.
C.L. No. 12/VIIb-47 , dated 17th January, 1978

It encloses a copy of confidential Circular Letter No. 25022/99/77-F, I, dated 27th
September, 1977, from Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. This
letter says that it would not be desirable to accept the passport of a foreigner as surety for
any purpose even when a foreigner offers himself to stand guarantee for any other
foreigner for any purpose.
 (v)
Young criminals
C.L. No. 77/IVh-36 , dated 28th May, 1976
Young criminals in the age group of 16 to 21 who are unable to furnish bail after
passing of bail order may be entrusted to the Probation Officer (Government have been
moved to post a Probation Officer in each district and also to amend suitably the First
Offenders Probation Act and Section 360, Cr.P.C., 1973).
(vi)
Bail in cases under Defence of India Rules, 1971
C.L. No. 19 , dated 31st January, 1975

Bail in cases under the Defence of India Rules should be granted only within the
frame-work of the limitations imposed by clause (b) of rule 184 of the Defence of India
Rules, 1971.
(vii)
Compliance of Court's order dated 8.2.90 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail
Application Nor. 1704 of 1990 Guddu v. State of U.P. arising out of Case
Crime No.492 of 1989, U/Ss. 379/411 I.P.C., P.S., Mutthiganj, District
Allahabad.