# the work and reputation of their subordinate Officers

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 82
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1961-08-29
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 82
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/the-work-and-reputation-of-their-subordinate-officers-161960
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

10
C.L. No. 82 dated 29th August, 1961
The District Judges should invariably mention the station of their posting below
their signatures at the bottom of the annual confidential reports given by them about
the work and reputation of their subordinate Officers.
C.L. No. 5 dated 28th January, 1950 as modified by
C.L. No. 44 dated 19th August, 1960
The remarks and the integrity certificates are to be sent confidentially with a D.O.
letter addressed to the Registrar by name.
C.L. No. 44 dated 19th August, 1960 read with
G.O. No. C.R. 583/ii-A-38, 1956 dated 5th December, 1959
Adverse remarks made on the work and conduct of Judicial Officers should be
communicated by District Judges, as early as possible, in writing, and acknowledgement
obtained.
C.L. No. 57/68, dated 31st May, 1968
Directions contained in aforesaid circular regarding communication of adverse
remarks are applicable to Chief Judicial Magistrates and Judicial Magistrates as well.
When the adverse remarks are to be communicated, the whole remark for the same
officer, whether commendatory or critical, should be communicated.
C.L. No. 45 dated 7th August, 1963
Adverse remarks should invariably be communicated to the Officers concerned so
that they may not be ignorant of the shortcomings pointed out therein.
C.L. No. C-5/73 dated 15th January, 1973
C.L. No. C-36/73 dated 19th April, 1973 and
C.L. No. 37/75 dated 19th March, 1975
A note that the adverse remarks have been communicated to the Officers concerned
should be made at the end of the remarks and this should be done before despatching the
same to the Court.
C.L. No. C-76/79 dated 10th July, 1979 and
C.L. No. C-126/79 dated 30th October, 1979
The representations made by the Officers to the Court against adverse remarks and
in other matters should be submitted in duplicate.
C.L. No. 11/1988 dated 11th February, 1988
The Court has noticed that the annual remarks about the Judicial Officers are often
not received from the District Judges within the stipulated period i.e. by April 15.
It has also been noticed that comments on the representations made by the Officers
against adverse remarks are not sent by the District Judges early, with the result that such
representations remain pending for a long time.