# those in which limitation may be expiring

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 4/V-58
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1975-07-25
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 4/V-58
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/those-in-which-limitation-may-be-expiring-162909
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

76
C.L. No. 4/V-58, dated 27th January, 1949
(13)
On coming to court the presiding officer should first take applications and pass
orders thereon and no application should be taken after the fixed hour except
those in which limitation may be expiring.
(14)
No one should be allowed to approach the Ahalmad and Readers for making
enquiries with regard to cases.
(15)
Reader's diary should be kept on the table in the courtroom where counsel for the
parties sits.
C.L. No. 128 dated 6th October, 1975
(16)
District Judges should keep a vigilant eye on such officials against whom
complaints from public are received and they should also depute a senior officer
to inspect the work and movement of such officials by paying regular and surprise
visits. Name plates bearing the name of the official deputed to work on counters
should also be placed according to the instructions contained in D.O. Letter no.C61(7)/75, 0& M dated July 25, 1975 of the Chief Secretary to the Government.
C.L. No. 28 dated 3rd April, 1965.
(17)
As observed by the Chairman of the Committee for Investigation of Causes of
Corruption in subordinate courts in U.P. much control could be exercised on the
dilatory tactics of judgment debtors by court's vigilance and judicious use of the
provisions of C.P.C.
C.L. No. 40/V-e-58, dated 18th March, 1971
(18)
Notice on wooden boards at prominent places be displayed in every office and
court to the effect that acceptance and demand of bribe are illegal and if any one
demand bribe or tries to extort money, complaint should be made at once to the
Presiding Officer or the District Judge.
Whenever an oral complaint is made against any official the presiding
officer should see whether there is any substance in the complaint and they
proceed to take suitable and prompt action against the official concerned after
recording the statement of the complainant. In case of a written complaint, a
statement on oath of the complainant should be recorded without delay and
further action taken thereafter against the official concerned
C.L. No. 7/Ve-58/78 dated 6th October, 1978
Instructions contained in the above C.L. should be strictly complied with.
C.L. No. 149/V-e-58 dated 26th September, 1974
Presiding Officer/Officer-in-Charge should see that complaints, where there
might be any possibility of bribery or corruption, are not kept pending for long and are
disposed of promptly.