# to the Court who, after handing over the dak in the Court, may go to the office of the

- **Citation:** C.l. No. 116/Xb-2/Budget
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1979-10-01
- **Case number:** C.l. No. 116/Xb-2/Budget
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/to-the-court-who-after-handing-over-the-dak-in-the-court-may-go-to-the-office-162591
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

311
C.l. No. 116/Xb-2/Budget dated 5th July, 1977

Since the courier system has been introduced, accounts knowing man maybe sent
to the Court who, after handing over the dak in the Court, may go to the office of the
Accountant General, U.P. with complete and verified accounts (from treasury accounts)
and verify the figures of expenditure of the whole judgeship and income from court
compound with those booked in that office. After removing all the differences between
the accounts (of Distt. Judge‟s Office and that of A.G.‟s Office) hand over the verified
figures to the office of the Court. The office of the Court will then compile the figures of
all the judgeships and verify the same with those booked in the office of the Accountant
General, U.P. The District Judges who send the dak under courier system to Lucknow
Bench may send the accounts knowing assistant to the office of the Accountant General,
U.P., Allahabad with the direction that he should verify the figures in question with those
booked in that office and after verification hand over the same to the office of the Court.
C.L. No. 118/Xb-2/B-II dated 21st October, 1978

The statement may be sent to the court through the dealing assistant so that
mistakes, if any, may be told to him and he may be able to remove the differences in the
account and mistakes may not occur again.
C.L. No. 110/Xb-2 (Budget) dated 25th September, 1979

The accounts in respect of the 24 courts of Additional Sessions Judges and 84
courts of Munsifs Magistrates in the State to be established w.e.f. October 1, 1979, on the
recommendation of the VII Finance Commission report should be maintained separately.

The progressive figures of expenditure of the said courts with voucher number
and date may also be sent to the Court regularly by 5th of each month.
C.L. No. 64/Xb-2/Budget-II dated 11th June, 1980

Statement showing figures of expenditure under each sub-head should be
submitted to the Court positively by 5th of each month.
C.L. No. 78/Budget/Xb-2 dated 10th December, 1981

In order to avoid the chances of wrong classification and to minimize the
difficulties in verification and reconciliation of accounts it is necessary that each and
every voucher should bear separate seal with correct head OR sub-head viz., District
Judge, Civil Judge, Munsif, Process Serving Charges, Record Room and Copy Making
Charges, Criminal Courts, Honorary and Special Criminal Courts, Railway Magistrates,
Judge Small Causes Courts and Judge Anti-Corruption, Higher Criminal Courts and
Lower Criminal Courts created on the recommendation of the VII Finance Commission,
312
so that correct booking under proper heads of Account may be made in accounts and
records maintained in the office of A.G., U.P., Allahabad.

The statements of expenditure should be submitted to the Court in the prescribed
proforma positively by the 5th of each month, duly prepared in accordance with the above
directions.
C.L. No. 27/Budget/Xb-2, dated 27th April, 1983

It is very essential that each and every voucher should bear separate seal with
correct heads or sub-heads of account viz. "District Judge", OR District and Sessions
Judge-VII Finance Commission", "Munsif" OR "Munsif-VII Finance Commission".

The account in respect of the "District and Sessions Judge VII Finance
Commission" and "Munsif Magistrate-VII Finance commission" should invariably be
maintained separately and properly.

In future the statements of expenditure should be submitted to the Court in the
prescribed proforma by the 5th of each month positively so that there may not be delay in
the work of reconciliation of figures of expenditure with those booked in the office of the
A.G., U.P.
6.
MISCELLANEOUS STATEMENTS AND RETURNS
(i)
Annual stock returns and statements
C.L. No. 35/IXg-46 dated 9th April, 1951
Stock registers of furniture should be properly kept in all districts, showing court
wise, the number of articles of each kind in hand at the beginning of the year, the number
of articles purchased during the year, the number of articles condemned during the year
and the number remaining in hand with a brief note as to the condition and location of
each article.

It is essential that the stock is carefully checked every year. A report about such
checking should be communicated to the Court by April 15, each year.

In this connection, reference is invited to the rules relating to the maintenance of
stock books of government property forwarded to all District Judges under G.O. no.
3128/XVIII-340-30, dated Novermber 24, 1934.
C.L. No. 31 dated 2nd May, 1962
A separate number for each article of furniture should be given in the stock book
maintained in the judgeship. For example, if there are 238 chairs they should bear 238
different numbers and similar should be the case with all other articles of furniture. This
procedure facilitates checking because it is easy to note in the stock book the serial
number of the particular article which are allotted to a particular Court-room or to the
residence of a particular officer.

The expenses involved in numbering the articles of furniture are to be met from
the contingent grant.