# treated as sufficient for the purpose of counting their outturn

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 2679/L.C
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1998-05-25
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 2679/L.C
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/treated-as-sufficient-for-the-purpose-of-counting-their-outturn-162385
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

234
I am, therefore, to request that pending approval of the aforesaid revision, the
standard prescribed for English and Hindi typists falling short by 20% and that of English
and Hindi copyists falling short by 12% may not be adversely considered and the same be
treated as sufficient for the purpose of counting their outturn.
[23] LITIGATION
C.L. No. 2679/L.C. dated 25th May, 1998
Submission of List of Cases with full particulars concerning Civil Court employees
In which High Court and/or the District Judge are the parties.
As per prevalent practice in the past the District Judges were permitted to contest
the cases concerning its employees in consultation with the Chief Standing Counsel
under intimation to the Court. It has been noticed that the copies of the cases concerning
Civil Court employees in which High Court is not a party were not made available to the
Cell by the Chief Standing Counsel nor the Litigation Cell has any knowledge about such
cases and regarding filing of counter affidavit in such cases.
Now on the recommendation of the Court the State Government has been pleased
to appoint shri Sunil Ambwani, Sri Sudhir Agrawal and Sri K.R.Sirohi Advocates as
Special Counsel to look after the cases of Officers and Officials of the High Court,
Officers of Subordinate Judiciary and Officials/employees of Civil Courts of the State of
Uttar Pradesh. Shri Sunil Ambwani has been authorised to accept notices of such cases
on behalf of the High Court and/or District Courts.
After approval of the aforesaid panel the Special Counsel find it very difficult to
contest the cases concerning Civil Court employees In the absence of copies of counter
affidavits in the cases and also In the absence of copies of writ petitions in which High
Court is not a party.
In the circumstances narrated hereinabove I am desired to request you to:
a) furnish a list of cases with full particulars concerning employees if the
Judgeship.
b) make available copies of the counter affidavits filed by or on behalf of the
District Judge in the cases concerning employees of the Judgeship:
c) make also available the copies of the writ petitions/cases preferred by the
aggrieved employees of the Judgeship in which High Court is not a party.
Please ensure strict compliance of the directions at the earliest, preferably within a
fortnight from the date of receipt of the Circular Letter.
[24] MISCELLANEOUS
(a) Change of name of English Office
C.L. No. 42/Xe-5 dated 15th April, 1961
The name of English Office is changed as "Administrative Office" (Prashashkiya
Karyalaya).