# triplicate, as the case may be

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 69/VIII-b-71
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1956-08-23
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 69/VIII-b-71
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/triplicate-as-the-case-may-be-162805
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

38
Accountant General, or the Government, should be sent duplicate. But where copies have
to be sent both to Government and the Accountant General, the letters should be sent in
triplicate. The enclosures accompanying such letters have also to be sent in duplicate or
triplicate, as the case may be.
C.L. No. 69/VIII-b-71 dated 23rd August, 1956

All letters and requisitions with which postage stamps, etc. are sent to the Court
should be addressed to the Deputy Registrar of the Court by name.

Before sending such letters and requisitions to the Court, care should be taken to
check the stamps, their number, denomination and total value and this should be clearly
written on the left-hand corner at the foot of the forwarding letter.
C.L. No. C-161/76 dated 15th October, 1976
The letters forwarding statements of outturn should be addressed to the Registrar
in the Confidential Department.
C.L. No. 38/VIIIg-48/Admn. (G) dated 26th August, 1988
The directions issued by the Court should be sent to the outlying courts in tahsils
at the earliest.
C.L. No. 87/VIII b-263 dated 27 August, 1958

Notices to parties and requisitions of files received from the High Court should
not be entered in the Registers of receipts and issues (Form nos. 62 and 63), maintained
in the District Judge's office. They should continue to be entered in registers maintained
only by the miscellaneous clerks, the Nazirs and the Record Keepers of the courts
concerned. Due precautions must, however, be taken to see that they do not remain
unattended beyond a reasonable time.
(ii)
Compliance of D.Os.
C.L. No. 119/VIII-g-41-29 dated 8/13th December, 1951
District Judges should take steps to ensure that replies to the Court's letter are
sent as expeditiously as possible. If for some reason it is not possible to send a complete
reply within four weeks, an interim reply should invariably be sent intimating the
approximate time within which a complete reply will be sent.
C.L. No. 155/Admn. (G) dated 12th October, 1977

The District Judge should maintain a separate file of all D.O. letters received
from the High Court and instruct the Munsarim to put up that file before him once a
week on a fixed day so that he may be able to find out which D.O. letters have been
complied with and, if not, for what reason the compliance has not been made.

Necessary instructions in this behalf may also be issued to all the officers,
particularly the Chief Judicial Magistrate, for strict compliance.
C.L. No. 198/Admn. (A) dated 10th December, 1976
While distributing the administrative work, hitherto done by the Chief Judicial
Magistrates, between the Chief Judicial Magistrates and Additional Chief Judicial
39
Magistrates, the Court has directed that the correspondence work, compliance of High
Court orders etc. and collection of statements will be done by the Chief Judicial
Magistrates.
C.L. No. 146/VIIIa-30 dated 15th September, 1977

The Court has noticed that compliance reports in respect of orders and directions
issued by the Court are not submitted with due promptitude and that in most of the cases
even after reminders compliance reports are received after inordinate delay.

All judicial officers should ensure that the compliance reports are submitted to the
Court without avoidable delay.
(iii)
Reminders to Registrar
C.L. No. 50/VIII-g-41 dated 19th May, 1951

District Judges should remind the Registrar demiofficially whenever any letter
sent to this Court by them or any officer subordinate to them remains unreplied for a
period of two months. They should also send to the Registrar a list of letters which have
remained pending for over two months.
C.E. No. 21 Main L dated 18th March, 1972

Reminders should be issued on printed post cards or Inland letters which may be
requisitioned from the Government Press.
(iv)
Channel of representation
C.L. No. C-126 dated 26th November, 1970

Officers working under the District Judge should send all their communications
to the Court through the District Judge and in the ordinary circumstances no advance
copy of a letter or representation need be sent to the Court by them. In extraordinary
circumstances an advance copy may be sent by them but to the Registrar and in no case
to any Hon'ble Judge of the Court.
(v)
Writing of full name by the Judicial Officers

C.L. No. 21/Admn. (A) dated 23rd February, 1979

All the judicial officers should mention their full names invariably in all
correspondence, which is made with the Court in future.

The officers may put their signatures in short form but they must mention their
full names below their signatures adding, I, II, III etc. if any.
C.L. No. 1/IVf-103 dated 2nd Junuary, 1984 and
C.L. No. 24/IVf-103 dated 29th March, 1984 and
C.L. No. 70/IVf-103 (Admn.-H) dated 24th October, 1986

It encloses a list containing the names and numbers of the judicial officers.

All the judicial officers should write their full names as well as quote their
number invariably in all future correspondence with the Court.