# uncontested petty cases may, however, be heard at the spot but by way of precaution the

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 130/Admn
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1979-11-07
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 130/Admn
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/uncontested-petty-cases-may-however-be-heard-at-the-spot-but-by-way-of-163460
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

290
uncontested petty cases may, however, be heard at the spot but by way of precaution the
Magistrate concerned should hold his court at a place from where he cannot see the
Municipal authorities detecting offences and prosecuting people because once the
offenders know that the condition at the spot can be quickly inspected by the trying
Magistrate, they would not raise unnecessary objections.
C.L. No. 130/Admn. (A) dated 7th November, 1979

The District Judges should see that all the cases relating to embezzlement in
cooperative societies pending in different courts, in their judgeship are transferred to the
special courts concerned at an early date, if not already done.
C.L. No. 68/VIIC-227 dated 15th October, 1982

The cases under section 125 Cr.P.C. should be transferred to one MunsifMagistrate with the direction that he may dispose them of expeditiously on priority basis.

Half-yearly reports of the effect and consequence of implementation of this
scheme should be submitted to the Court.
C.L. No. 66/IVg-103/Admn. (A) dated 22nd June, 1978

The District Judge should nominate one Magistrate in the district for deciding
cases under the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 and transfer all pending cases under"
this Act to his court for being decided on priority basis.
C.L. No. 79/IVg-103 dated 11th December, 1981
All cases under the Indian Penal Code relating to atrocities on Harijans should be
entrusted for disposal to the Magistrate already nominated by the District Judge for
deciding cases under the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955.
C.L. No. 79/Admn. (A)/VIIF-189 dated 14th November, 1984

The cases pending under the Section 198 A and 211 of the U.P. Zamindari
Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 and section 27 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on
Land Holdings Act, 1960 shall be soon transferred to the courts of Judicial Magistrates
constituting special courts to try economic offences in the district headquarters as well as
in tahsil headquarters (wherever courts of Munsif-Magistrates are situate in tahsil
headquarters) with directions to dispose of such cases on top priority basis. They should
so arrange their cause-lists that cases under these sections are put on the top and
thereafter other types of cases. They should also be directed that such cases should not be
adjourned for a long time. At the most, they may be adjourned for a week only. The
District Judge should keep a vigilant eye on the listing and disposal of such cases.

A report in respect of such cases should be submitted to the Court every month
giving the number of such cases pending at the commencement of the month and
disposed of during the month.