# (v) Advances from provident funds

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 28
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1964-05-02
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 28
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/v-advances-from-provident-funds-162352
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

201
(v) Advances from provident funds
C.L. No. 28 dated 2nd May, 1964
The District Judges are required to impress upon drawing and disbursing Officers
in their judgeships that they should use Form Nos. 6-A and 6-B (Treasury Form Nos.
359 and 359-A) for gazetted and non-gazetted government servants respectively for
drawal of advances from Provident Fund.
C.L. No. 43/Admn. (D) dated 5th, July, 1984
The District Judges should, before sanctioning G.P.F. advances to the officials,
ensure that excess payment is not made and the G.P.F. Rules 15(1) and 115(2)be
followed strictly.
G.L. No. 48-146/7-64 dated 13th September, 1935
The power to sanction temporary advances under rule 15(3) of the General
Provident Fund (U.P.) Rules in respect of non-gazetted Officers has been delegated to
District and Sessions Judges in Uttar Pradesh.
G.L. No. 51/Xb-15 dated 23rd April, 1970
A subscriber who has drawn non-refundable advance from provident funds for
meeting expenditure on marriage purposes must within one month from the date of
marriage or if he is on leave, within one month on return from leave, furnish to the
sanctioning authority a certificate that the money has been actually utilized for the
purpose it was intended. On failure to furnish the certificate or in the event the amount
has been spent for a purpose other than that for which sanction was given the entire
amount so drawn together with interest thereon will have to be re-deposited in one lump
sum.
(vi) Pay and allowances of the period of strike
C.L. No.63/III-36/Strike Admn.(D) dated 10th December, 1992
Pay and allowances of the employees for the period of strike relating to
Shahjahanpur matter.
I am directed to say that Hon‟ble Court has considered about pay for the period of
strike relating to Shahjahanpur matter and is of the opinion that the principle of „No work
no pay‟ is final. Whenever there is strike in future by the employees of Civil Court the
District Judges will follow this principle without waiting for direction from the High
Court.
In this regard I am to add that in view of the unconditional withdrawal of the strike
by the employees in Shahjahanpur matter a lenient view has been taken and the Court is
of the view that the principle of „No work no pay‟ in their case will not have the effect of
break in service.
C.L. No. 3 / Ve-60/Admn. (D) Sec: Dated 16th January, 1998
Payment of salary for the period the employees remained on strike from 13.9.1992
to 7.10.1992
I am directed to say that the court has considered the aforesaid matter and is pleased
to order that the above period of absence of each employee on strike may be regularised
in the form of earned leave if applied by each and every official.
202

(vii) Removal of anomalies
C.L. No. 45/Ve-60/Admn. (D) dated 19th July, 1991
Concerning removal of anomalies in pay of employees
I am directed to say that it has come to the notice of the Court that anomalies in the
pay scale of employees continue to exist and as a result thereof they are put to
harassment.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to dispose of all such matters, if pending so
far.
C.L. No. 30 / Ve-75/ Admn. (D) section: Dated: 6th August, 1998
Revised pay scales on the basis of the recommendations of U.P. Anomalies
committee, 1989 in respect of permanent and temporary posts in the Subordinate
Courts.
In continuation to the court‟s endorsement No. 11520/Ve-75/Admn.(D) section,
dated 22.7. 1998, on the above subject, I am directed to send herewith a copy of G.O.
No. 4084/sat- Nyaya-2-47G/91-TC, dated 22.4.1998 along with its enclosures for
information and necessary action.