# vice-versa will be made yearly

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 163/IV-h-19/Admn.(A)
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1976-10-16
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 163/IV-h-19/Admn.(A)
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/vice-versa-will-be-made-yearly-163676
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

417
C.L. No. 163/IV-h-19/Admn.(A) dated 16th October, 1976

Only civil work should be allotted to some of the Additional District Judges and
only criminal work to rest of the Additional District Judges, depending on the pendency
of civil and criminal work in the judgeship. The changeover from civil to criminal and
vice-versa will be made yearly.
C.L. No. 63/IV h-14 dated 12th June, 1979

In future Sessions Judges should see that criminal revisions and equally
distributed for hearing in the file of Sessions Judges and Additional Sessions Judges.
C.L. No. 108-B dated 17th October, 1952

Jail appeals need quick disposal and should normally not be transferred by
Sessions Judges to other courts.
C.L. No. 2041-B dated 2nd June, 1912
It should be clearly understood that extra officers are deputed to assist in the
disposal of work in those exceptional circumstances where arrears and institutions have
accumulated to such an extent as to make the reduction of work impossible by the efforts
of the ordinary staff. The posting of an extra officer is not therefore to be made the
opportunity for a permanent man to proceed on leave. This nullifies the whole object of
the creation of the additional post. Nor is it conducive to the expeditious dispatch of work
that the new officer should have made over to him old or part-heard cases, and this
practice where it exists should be discontinued. Additional staff can be best employed in
hearing appeals, whenever the officer is empowered to do this work, and in taking up
new cases as they arise. This results in a minimum dislocation of work and enables the
permanent staff to dispose of all its arrears.
C.L. No. 67/VIII-b-13 dated 12th August, 1968

In transferring cases, the District Judges should exercise their discretion in such a
manner as courts, which are already burdened, should not be burdened further. Courts
meant for doing civil work should primarily do civil work and criminal work should be
transferred to such court only when there is not enough civil work to keep them fully
occupied. Haphazard transfer of criminal work results in dislocation of civil work. It is
highly improper on the part of a District Judge to avoid doing civil work, which is
equally important.
C.L. No. 44/VIII-a-14 dated 22nd March, 1971

Bail and transfer applications should invariably be taken up by the Sessions Judge
himself unless for special reasons he is unable to do so. In case the bail applications are
entrusted to Additional or Assistant Sessions Judges, the record should be maintained by
the sessions clerk of the Sessions Judge, so that responsibility can be fixed on one official
for not pointing out that an earlier application has already been rejected. Every
application for bail must clearly indicate whether it is the first bail application or not and
if not, what order was passed on the earlier application.