# view of the proposed amendments in the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Civil Courts

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 8/Ve-4/Admn
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1994-07-28
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 8/Ve-4/Admn
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/view-of-the-proposed-amendments-in-the-uttar-pradesh-subordinate-civil-courts-162260
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

179
view of the proposed amendments in the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Civil Courts
Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947.
C.L. No. 8/Ve-4/Admn. (D) dated 9th February, 1995
Ambiguity regarding marks obtained in optional subjects and compulsory subjects in
the recruitment test under the U.P. Subordinate Civil Courts Ministerial Establishment
Rules, 1947
Hon‟ble the Chief Justice and Judges have considered the matter of marks‟
obtained by candidates appearing in optional subjects in addition to the compulsory
subjects, in recruitment tests held under the U.P. Subordinate Courts Ministerial
Establishment Rules,1947 as amended from time to time and it has been decided that the
marks obtained by a candidate appearing in the optional subjects on his possessing the
prescribed speed in shorthand and typewriting, may not be added to the marks obtained in
the written test for the purpose of the merit list, which shall be prepared after conducting
examination both in compulsory and optional papers, but while preparing the Register of
selected candidates under Rule 14 (1) of the U.P. Subordinate Courts Ministerial
Establishment Rules,1947, an entry be made in remarks column against the name of the
candidate who has qualified also as a stenographer or as a typist.
I am, therefore, to ask you to kindly ensure strict compliance of the Court‟s
decision in the matter in connection with all recruitment tests held under the U.P.
Subordinate Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947, as amended from time to time.
 (iv) Life of Select List
C.L. No. 66/Ve-4/Admn. (D) dated 28th July, 1994
Life of select list of Class III posts in subordinate courts
I am directed to say that the Court has been pleased to extend the validity of the
select list prepared by you in your judgeship for Class III posts from one to three years.
You are, therefore, directed to implement the instructions contained in this circular
letter with immediate effect.
C.L. No. 77/Ve-4/Admn.(D) dated 24th August,1994
Guidelines concerning operation of select list of Class III candidates while offering
appointments on the establishment of the subordinate courts.
In continuation of and with reference to the Court‟s C.L. No. 66/Ve-4/Admn.(D),
dated July 28, 1994 regarding the life of the select list prepared for appointment to Class
III posts to the subordinate courts, I am directed to send herewith the copies of two
judgments delivered by the Court on 19.5.1993 and 5.8.1994 in the following cases for
strict compliance :
1. Special Appeal No. 235 of 1993 connected with Special Appeals Nos. 233 of
1993 and 263 of 1993.*
2. Special Appeal No. 278 of 1993.
The guidelines prescribed in the two judgments, that appointment in short term
leave vacancy is not protected under Rule 14(3) of U.P. Subordinate Civil Courts
Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947, must be strictly adhered to in the preparation of

* For perusal of Judgment see Sachida nand Singh v. State of U.P.; 1994 AWC 1023: 1994 (23) ALR 25 (H.C. Sum)