# were not called and were not placed before the Presiding Officer

- **Citation:** C.L.No. 12 /2004
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 2004-03-31
- **Case number:** C.L.No. 12 /2004
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/were-not-called-and-were-not-placed-before-the-presiding-officer-163054
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

117
unregistered private complaints, unregistered criminal miscellaneous petitions in
maintenance cases, unregistered maintenance cases and criminal miscellaneous petitions
were not called and were not placed before the Presiding Officer.
I am, therefore, directed to send herewith a copy of Order Dated 5.5.2003 passed by
Hon'ble Supreme Court in petition for special Leave to appeal (C) No.914:Ch.
Venkateshwar Rao Vs. The Registrar (administration) High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hyderabad, A.P.& Anr. For your Information and necessary action.
54.
NON COMPLIANCE OF THE PROVISIONS AS CONTAINED IN SUB
RULE 6 OF RULE 196 OF THE CENTRAL RULES (CIVIL), 1957 VOL. I
AND RULE 18 OF CHAPTER 12 OF GENERAL RULE (CRIMINAL),
1997 BY THE SUBORDINATE COURTS.
C.L.No. 12 /2004: Dated: 31st March, 2004
The Hon'ble court in the past has issued circular letter No.2dated 2.1.1984, C.L.
No. 38 dated 11.8.2000 and C.L.No.9dated 4.3.2003 whereby directions were issued that
the provisions as contained in first & second proviso of sub Rule (6) of Rule 196 of the
General Rules (civil) 1957, Volume I and Rule 118 of Chapter XII of General Rules
(criminal) 1977 be followed strictly but time and again the Hon'ble Court is noticing that
the aforesaid provisions are still not being complied with strictly causing much
inconvenience in the proceedings of the cases filled in the court.

 In continuation of the courts circular letters referred to above. I am sanding
herewith a copy of order dated 14.1.2004 passed by the court (Hon'ble Mr. Justice
R.S.Tripathi) in Criminal Revision No.54 of 1986 wherein the Hon'ble court has
observed with concern that in several cases when the original record s requisitioned by
the court it has been found that the record has been weeded out
 I am, therefore directed to say you to kindly comply with the directions as
contained in the court's circular letter strictly and the original records of all those cases in
which stay/bail orders are communicated after filing of records/ appeal before this court
be preserved.
55. MORNING COURT IN THE DISTRICTS.
C.L.No. 15/ Main P/Admin. A-3 dated 19 April, 2004

 I am directed to inform you that the matter regarding functioning of the Morning
courts was considered by the Hon'ble Court and the Hon'ble court has been pleased to
resolve that the courts in all the District shall function from 10.30 A.M. to 4.00 P.M.
even during the month of May and June.
56.
UNAUTHORIZED
PERSONS
WORKING
IN
THE
OFFICES
OF
SUBORDINATE COURTS AND HANDLING THE GOVERNMENT WORK
AND RECORDS.
C.L.No. 27/ dated: 15th September, 2004
 In C.M. writ Petition No. 32455 of 2004-Vimal Kishore Nigam Vs. state of
U.P. & others , the Hon'ble court (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sunil Ambwani) has observed
with serious concern that there is an alarming situation of gross indiscipline prevalent in
118
the subordinate courts allowing unauthorized persons to work in the offices, handling the
government work and records. The Hon'ble court has further observed that the matter is
quite serious and calls for immediate and urgent action and where-ever unauthorized
persons are working, disciplinary action be initiated and criminal prosecution be taken
against such persons. Also, stern action be taken against that employee who permits
unauthorized persons to work in the office and compliance report be sent to the court.
 I am, therefore, directed to send herewith a copy of order dated 13.8.2004 passed
in C.M. Writ petition No.32455 of 2004-Vimal Kishore Nigam Vs. State of U.P. and
others and to request you that identity cards be issued to each and every employee of the
Judgeship and to ensure that unauthorized persons are not allowed to enter into the
offices of Judgeship and that a pass system be introduced to check such unauthorized
entry in courts and offices.
 I am also to add that the contents of the circular letter be brought to the notice of
all the Judicial officers as well as all concerned in your Judgeship for strict compliance.
57.
MEASURES REGARDING SUPERINTENDENCE OVER THE JUDICIAL
OFFICERS WORKING IN FAMILY COURTS.
C.L.No.11/ 2005 Dated: 24- March, 2005
 I am directed to say that a upon a careful consideration of matter regarding
superintendence over the judicial Officers working in family Courts the Hon'ble court
has been pleased to provide following measures:-
1.
 Every Principal Judge Additional Judge or other Judge of a Family Court shall
send his daily sitting register to the District Judge so that as to reach him latest by
10.30 a.m. each day for his information and initials, else he will be treated and
marked absent for the day.
2.
Every principal Judge Additional Judge or other Judge of a family Court shall
attend the meetings/monthly meetings of all the presiding officers of civil and
Criminal court that are called by the District judge in compliance with Court's
Circular letter nos. 129/Admin (b) dated 8th October 1975, 4 dated 3rd February,
1976and 86 dated 31st may 1976.
3.
The District Judge having administrative control shall record annual/special
remarks in the confidential record if the Principal Judge, additional Judge or other
judge of a family court.
I am, therefore, to request that the measures so provided be brought to the notice
of every Principal Judge, Additional Judge or other Judge of a family court under you
administrative control for compliance faithfully and punctually.
58. CIRCULATION OF COPY OF THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED
BY THE HON'BLE COURT IN FIRST APPEAL NO.271 OF 2005 -MOTI
LAL VS. BHAGWAN DAS.
C.L.No.24/ 2005 dated 8th August,2005.
 I am directed to send herewith a copy of Judgment and order dated 4.3.2005
passed by Hon'ble Court (Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli , J. and Hon'ble G.P.Srivastava, J.) in