# were to be abolished on the date on which the sanctioned term expires

- **Citation:** C. L. No. 28
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1969-03-12
- **Case number:** C. L. No. 28
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/were-to-be-abolished-on-the-date-on-which-the-sanctioned-term-expires-162851
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

50
cases that would be left part-heard by the presiding officers of such court if the court
were to be abolished on the date on which the sanctioned term expires.

The letter recommending the extension of the term of such court should also
mention whether there is justification for extending the term of the temporary court by
reason only of undisposed or part-heard cases. The letter should contain as much
information as possible about the necessity of extending the term of the temporary court.

The presiding officers of such court should, so far as practicable, arrange their
work in such a manner, that no part heard cases, specially big ones in which the major
part of the hearing has been concluded, remain undiposed of by the time the sanctioned
term expires. This has to be particularly borne in mind when the work is light.
C. L. No. 28, dated 12th March, 1969

District Judges should see that the quarterly statements showing the institution,
disposal, pendency, and the person-days required for the disposal of pending cases are
furnished in respect of each temporary court functioning in the Judgeship.
C. L. No. 12-B, dated 18th January, 1952

All District Judges should submit a report to the Court by the end of October each
year, whether, so far as can be foreseen, they are likely to need any additional help in the
shape of Additional District & Sessions Judge during the financial year following the
year under report. If no help is required the court should be so informed.

In case additional help is needed a rough estimate of the details regarding salaries,
establishment charges and contingencies including rent for court building, where
necessary, should be given.
G. L. No. 3827-B-1-49, dated 26th April, 1949 as modified by
C. L. No. 15/B-4-60, dated 23rd February, 1960

All District Judges, while proposing creation of temporary courts, should state
whether or not the court building is electrified. Where the court building is electrified but
fans are required to be taken on hire the amount of such hire charges should also be
stated.
The contingent grants for temporary courts of Additional District Judges, Civil Judges,
and Munsifs are to be at the following rates, namely:
1.
Rs. 25 per mensem for court fitted with electric fans,
2.
Rs. 60 for mensem for courts not fitted with electric fans and where either pankha
pullers are employed or electric fans are taken on hire for the period 16th April to
15th October, and at Rs. 25 per mensem for the rest of the year.
C. L. No. 115, dated 24th December, 1957
While forwarding proposal for the creation of the temporary court of Additional
District Judge, necessary requirements of typewriters, furniture's, accommodation, etc.,
for the court should also be furnished to the High Court for transmission to Government.