# were to be abolished on the date on which the sanctioned term expires

- **Citation:** C. L. No. 28
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 2002-08-03
- **Case number:** C. L. No. 28
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/were-to-be-abolished-on-the-date-on-which-the-sanctioned-term-expires-162852
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

50
cases that would be left part-heard by the presiding officers of such court if the court
were to be abolished on the date on which the sanctioned term expires.

The letter recommending the extension of the term of such court should also
mention whether there is justification for extending the term of the temporary court by
reason only of undisposed or part-heard cases. The letter should contain as much
information as possible about the necessity of extending the term of the temporary court.

The presiding officers of such court should, so far as practicable, arrange their
work in such a manner, that no part heard cases, specially big ones in which the major
part of the hearing has been concluded, remain undiposed of by the time the sanctioned
term expires. This has to be particularly borne in mind when the work is light.
C. L. No. 28, dated 12th March, 1969

District Judges should see that the quarterly statements showing the institution,
disposal, pendency, and the person-days required for the disposal of pending cases are
furnished in respect of each temporary court functioning in the Judgeship.
C. L. No. 12-B, dated 18th January, 1952

All District Judges should submit a report to the Court by the end of October each
year, whether, so far as can be foreseen, they are likely to need any additional help in the
shape of Additional District & Sessions Judge during the financial year following the
year under report. If no help is required the court should be so informed.

In case additional help is needed a rough estimate of the details regarding salaries,
establishment charges and contingencies including rent for court building, where
necessary, should be given.
G. L. No. 3827-B-1-49, dated 26th April, 1949 as modified by
C. L. No. 15/B-4-60, dated 23rd February, 1960

All District Judges, while proposing creation of temporary courts, should state
whether or not the court building is electrified. Where the court building is electrified but
fans are required to be taken on hire the amount of such hire charges should also be
stated.
The contingent grants for temporary courts of Additional District Judges, Civil Judges,
and Munsifs are to be at the following rates, namely:
1.
Rs. 25 per mensem for court fitted with electric fans,
2.
Rs. 60 for mensem for courts not fitted with electric fans and where either pankha
pullers are employed or electric fans are taken on hire for the period 16th April to
15th October, and at Rs. 25 per mensem for the rest of the year.
C. L. No. 115, dated 24th December, 1957
While forwarding proposal for the creation of the temporary court of Additional
District Judge, necessary requirements of typewriters, furniture's, accommodation, etc.,
for the court should also be furnished to the High Court for transmission to Government.
51
C. L. No. 102, dated 5th August, 1971
District Judges should ensure that proposals for extension of the term of
temporary courts should reach the Court three months in advance of the date of expiry of
their term positively with fully justification.
C.L.No.27/JR(I),Dated: August 3, 2002
In continuation of other earlier Court's circular Letter No. 24/JR(I) dated
25.7.2001, I am directed to say that the court has been pleased to order that point
NO.(i)&(ii) of the said Circular Letter be treated as withdrawn. Now, not only the
postings hereinafter but also the earlier postings and appointments made to the Fast Track
court by promotions shall be against the court's sanctioned by the government for the
purpose.
I am, therefore to say that the regular H.J.S. officers who are posted in the fast
Track courts be transferred/posted in the regular courts and the officers promoted against
fast Track courts be transferred/posted in the Fast Track Courts.
(i)
Monthly statement of pendency of disposal in Fast Track Courts in your
District.
C.L. No. 17 /FTC (Monitoring Cell) Allahabad; Dated: 4th May, 2006
In super session of earlier Court's Letter No. 11389 dated: 22.08.03. I am directed
to request you to submit consolidated statement of all Fast Track Courts in prescribed
proforma on monthly basis instead of fortnightly basis. The same should be sent to this
court by means of Fax/Special messenger latest by 5th day of every succeeding month.
 Enclosure: Prescribed proforma.
PROFORMA
Monthly Statement of Pendency, Institution and Disposal of cases by Fast Track
Courts in District for the period....
Sl.
No.
Name of
presiding
Officers of
Fast Track
Courts
Fast
Track
Court
No.
Total Number
of Sessions
Trial pending
in fast Track
Courts on
First day of
month
Number of
Sessions
Trials
transferred to
Fast Track
Courts during
the month
Total number
of Sessions
Trials
disposed of
by Fast Track
Courts during
month
Closing
Balance
at the
end
of the
month
Reasons, if any
where 14
Sessions Trials
have not been
disposed of
during the
month

Prepared by Checked By
 District & Sessions Judge

(Name & Designation of official)

(Name & designation of Official)
Date..........
(ii)
Regarding functioning of Human rights courts.
C.L.No.18/ 2006/ Admin.(A-3)/Dated: 10th May, 2006
I have been directed to say that after consideration of the matter regarding
functioning of Human Rights courts, the court has been pleased to observe that the
functioning of the Human Rights Courts will be treated from the date on which