# will be in proforma No. 2

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 62
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1961-09-12
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 62
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/will-be-in-proforma-no-2-162200
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

142
It is further decided that in case of those employees also who have already been
retrenched, a certificate by the concerned appointing authority will be necessary which
will be in proforma No. 2.
Under sub-rule (2) of rule 4, cent-per-cent reservation will be made for retrenched
employees on all class IV posts and technical posts of class III which are beyond the
purview of the Public Service Commission.
C.E. No. 7 dated 16th January, 1969
Attention is also invited to para 3 of G.O. No. 41/2/67 Appointment (Kha), dated
May 28,1968, under which cent-per-cent: reservation of class IV posts and such technical
posts of class III category as are not under the purview of the Public Service
Commission, has been granted for the retrenched employees and it is clarified that in
those establishments where there is a provision for appointment of paid apprentices, the
post of apprentices will be reserved cent-per-cent for the retrenched employees, that is,
only such employees will be appointed on all the posts of the paid apprentice.
(vi) Copyists
G.L. No. 3/Ve-81 dated 27th February, 1952
As the outturn of a typist is more than that of an ordinary copyist, appointments in
the copying office should, so far as possible, be made from amongst persons who know
typewriting.
C.L. No. 62 dated 1st November, 1955
District Judges should employ only such copyist as can write legibly.
Indiscriminate appointment of copyists is undesirable and must be guarded against.
G.L. No. 7/Ve-77 dated 10th May, 1952 read with
C.L. No. 119/Ve-77 dated 17th November, 1952 and
C.L. No. 125/Ve-77 dated 6th December, 1969

All District Judges in Uttar Pradesh have been empowered to entertain extra
temporary copyists in the lowest sanctioned scale in their Copying Department at a cost
not exceeding Rs. 600 in a year (excluding clearness allowances) in each judgeship, in
case all the copyists are fully engaged and additional staff is necessary to cope with the
work in order to ensure speedy disposal.

Normally ordinary copies should be issued within a week. If such copies are
issued after a week, without any special circumstances, the work should be treated to be
falling in arrears.

At the end of each financial year the expenditure incurred on this account should
be reported to Government.

The charge will be debited to "27 -Administration of Justice-D-Civil and Sessions
Court-(f) Record Room or Copy making charges"* and every effort should be made by

*
Now 2014 Administration of Justice - 105 Civil and Sessions Court - 06 Record Room or Copy making
charges.
143
District Judges to meet the cost on the above account by affecting savings on nonessential items in their sanctioned budget allotment.
C.L. No. 48 dated 26th July, 1962

Under GO. No. A-l-3431/X-14(9)-1961, dated September 12, 1961, the District
Judges, in supersession of the C.L. No. 7/Ve-77, dated May 10, 1952, have been
authorised to entertain extra copyists and execution clerks in the lowest sanctioned scale
subject to the condition that no demand for extra funds or supplementaries will be
entertained on account of this delegation (vide serial no. 10 of the Caption "Temporary
Establishment" in the Annexure to the G.O. referred to).

In case they find it necessary to entertain any extra temporary copyist or copyists
which they cannot do for want of savings in their budget they should immediately move
the Court in the matter with facts and figures justifying their demand so that the Court
may sanction the entertainment of such temporary post or posts for a period not
exceeding one year in view of the powers delegated to the Court under serial no. 21821954, dated August 5, 1955 and provide funds from the grant placed at its disposal.
C.L. No. 67/Ve-77 dated 9th June, 1952

District Judges should notify such appointments made by them to Government
through the High Court.
C.L. No. 80/Ve-77 dated 19th July, 1952 read with
G.L. No. 24/Ve-77-1 dated 11th September, 1974

While reporting to the Court the appointment of additional copyist or while
applying for extra assistance in the Copying office, District Judges shall furnish
information on the points mentioned below:
(1)
Existing number of copyists, permanent and temporary.
(2)
Number of words copied out by each one of the copyists during the six
months preceding the month in which extra assistance is asked for. The
number of English and Urdu or Hindi words, in manuscript or type, should
be shown separately.
(3)
Number of days on which each copyist worked during the six months.
(4)
Average number of words (English and Urdu or Hindi, in manuscript or
type, to be shown separately) applied for, by applicants for copies, during
the twelve preceding months.
(5)
Number of English and Urdu or Hindi words in manuscript or type
pending for copy.
(6)
Whether the copyists were allowed to avail of the whole of the last
vacation; if not, the number of days in the vacation on which each copyist
worked.
(7)
Reasons for accumulation of arrears.