# will have to consider whether the loss should not be partly made good by the District

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 62/IVh-36
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1932-05-05
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 62/IVh-36
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/will-have-to-consider-whether-the-loss-should-not-be-partly-made-good-by-the-162676
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

4
District Judges are also under a personal obligation to see that the rule is fully
observed. Should a case of loss owing to a breach of this rule occur in future the Court
will have to consider whether the loss should not be partly made good by the District
Judge (whether in active service or in retirement) who may be found to have condoned a
breach of that rule or to have neglected to see that the rule was being properly observed.

District Judges or officer-in-charge of the Nazarat should pay unexpected visits to
the Nazarat and satisfy themselves that rule 351 of Chapter XII is being observed and
mention this fact in their annual civil report.
G.L. No. 22/94-1(3) dated 5th May, 1932
The Nazir must deposit all jewels and other valuables entrusted to him in his
official capacity in the treasury.

Any valuable deposited with the Nazir not in his official capacity, are deposited
with at the depositor's risk.
2.
PAYMENTS BY COURT
(i)
Repayment orders
(a)
Repayment applications
 C.L. No. 62/IVh-36 dated 22nd March, 1977
Henceforth, the Munsarim himself should obtain the report of the record room and Nazir
on the repayment applications and after giving his own report on the applications,
prepare the voucher and hand it over to the applicant.
G.L. No. 20/VIII-b-102 dated 20th October, 1951
The following directions are issued with regard to applications for refund of civil
court deposits:-
(1)
All repayment orders must be prepared within a week of the date of
presentation of the application. If the preparation of any repayment order
is delayed beyond a week, a report explaining the cause of delay should be
submitted to the district judge for orders.
(2)
Where an application for repayment is defective, it should not be thrown
out unless the error is a material one. Minor errors should be pointed out
to the applicant and allowed to be corrected by him and the application
should normally not be rejected on account of minor mistakes.
(3)
Where the record-room from where a report is required before repayment
can be made is situated at another station, the limit of one week
mentioned above may be extended by another week.
(4)
 Where the decree-holder applies for the withdrawal of a deposit
immediately after it has been made, the time for the preparation of the
repayment order may be reckoned not from the date of application but
from the date on which the General Number of the deposit is received
from the District Judge's Office or the date on which intimation is
received from the treasury of such deposit, whichever is later. The District