# (xv) Honoraria for broadcasting

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 19
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1994-11-18
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 19
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/xv-honoraria-for-broadcasting-162018
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

35
(xv) Honoraria for broadcasting
G.L. No. 67-46 40-96 dated 7th July, 1936
Payment of honorarium for broadcasting from an All India Radio station should be
made only when the Controller of Broadcasting considers it necessary and the head of the
office has no objection as it is desirable to encourage voluntary service. It should not
exceed the amount which he considers suitable in each case subject to the maximum
prescribed by the Government. Payments for regular assistance are subject to the
provisions of the rules contained in Government Servants Conduct Rules.
No payment should be made to Government Servants for talks connected with their
work and no conveyance allowance will be allowed in addition to the payment indicated
above.
C.L. No. 19 dated 5th March, 1965
Government servants should not undertake any occasional work of a literary,
artistic or scientific character without the prior sanction if it involves the acceptance of
remuneration as otherwise it will be in contravention of the provisions contained in rule15 of the Government Servant‟s Conduct Rules 1956.
(xvi) Regarding grant of permission to Judicial Officers for doing professional
courses
C.L No. 22/Adnm. (A), dated 1st May, 1996
I am directed to say that it has come to the notice of the Court that some time
Judicial Officers take admission or get themselves registered for professional courses
without obtaining prior permission of this Court. This is not a healthy practice. The Court
is of the view that the Judicial Officers must obtain prior permission of the Court before
committing to professional courses.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to bring the above fact to the notice of all the
Judicial Officers working under your administrative control for strict compliance in
future.
(xvii) Greeting Cards:
C.L. No. 108/G.C/Admn, „G‟ dated 18th November, 1994
Greeting on festive occasions to the Hon‟ble Chief Justice and other Hon‟ble Judges
of the Court
I am directed to say that the Court do not expect any Judicial officer to incur the
expense of sending New Year, Diwali or other Greeting Cards keeping in view the
expenditure involved therein and what is more their good wishes are always presumed to
be there for them.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to impress upon all the Judicial Officers that
they may keep in mind the aforesaid views of the Court and may not incur the expense in
sending New Year, Diwali or other Greeting Cards to Hon‟ble The Chief Justice and
Hon‟ble Judges of this Court in future.
C.L. No. 129/Admn.(G), dated 9th December, 1994
Greeting cards to Hon‟ble Judges
36
In the context of the high cost of greeting cards and with a view to save Judicial
Officers the expense thereof, the Hon‟ble Chief Justice and Judges have been pleased to
advise that they do not expect nor do they consider it necessary for any Judicial Officer to
send greeting cards to them on occasions like New Year, Diwali or Holi, as their good
wishes for them are always presumed. This may kindly be brought to the pointed
attention of all the Judicial Officers posted in your Sessions Division.
This Circular Letter is being issued in supersession of Circular Letter No.
108/G.C./Admn. (G)/of November 18, 1994.
(xviii) Name plates and light on private cars/scooters:
C.L. No. C-27/1993, dated 1st May, 1993
Fixing of name plates and lights on the private Cars and Scooters by the Judicial
Officers of U.P.
I am directed to say that it has come to the notice of the Court that Judicial Officers
are using name plates and lights on their private cars and scooters. This practice is not
permissible under the rules.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to direct all the Judicial Officers working
under you to desist from displaying name plates and lights on their private vehicles.
C.L. No. C-82/ Confidential/1993, dated 22nd December, 1993
I am directed to draw your attention towards the Circular Letter No. C-27/1993,
dated May 1,1993, a copy of which is being enclosed herewith on the above subject to
ensure the compliance of the said Circular Letter.
I am, there fore, to request you kindly to get the copies of the aforesaid Circular
Letter served on each Judicial Officer posted in your District under receipt emphasising
that the breach of the direction contained in the Circular Letter will entail a serious
disciplinary action against the Officer. Whenever you notice use of prohibited lights &
name plate on the private cars, you should take action in the matter & report the matter to
the High Court. While sending your annual assessment of Officer, such breach of
Circular may also be mentioned. The report of the compliance of this Circular Letter be
sent to the Court at an early date.
C.L..No. 24 Dated June 06, 2006.
Fixing of nameplates and lights on the private Cars and Scooters by the Judicial
Officers of U.P.
By way of orientation to the Courts Circular Letter No. C-27/1993, dated May 1,
1993 and Circular Letter No. C-82/Confidentia/1993, dated December 22, 1993, on the
above subject, I am desired to say that it has been brought to the notice of the Hon'ble
Court that the guidelines as contained in the Circulars referred to herein above, are not
being strictly followed and the Judicial Officers in the Judiciary under your
administrative control are In violation of Rules, still using plates displaying their posts
and beacon lights on their private vehicles.
I am, therefore, directed to request you kindly to invite attention of all Judicial
Officers posted in the judgeship under your administrative control re-emphasising that