# [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1090

- **Citation:** [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1090
- **Court:** Supreme Court of India
- **Decided:** 2016-02-05
- **Bench:** Madan B. Lokur, R.K. Agrawal
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/supreme-court-of-india/2016-1-s-c-r-1090-30892
- **Pages:** 25

## Headnote

Prison reforms:
Present case pertaining to conditions of prisons in India - By
instant order this Court held: Prisoners like all human beings deserve
to be treated with dignity - To give effect to that, certain positve
directions passed - Undertrial Review Committee in every District
directed to hold meetings periodically and follow up the discussions
with appropriate steps for release of undertrial prisoners and
convicts - The Committee to also look into aspects pertaining to
effective implementation of s.436 and s.436A of C~P.C - Member
Secretary of State Legal Services Authority of every Stare directed
to ensure that an adequate number of competent lawyers are
empaneled to assist undertrial prisoners and convicts - Secretary
of District Legal Services Authority directed to look into the issue
of release of undertrial prisoners in compoundable offences - Jail
Authorities directed to ensure proper and effective utilisation of
available funds for improving quality living conditions of prisoners
- Ministry of Home Affairs to ensure that Management Information
System is in place at the earliest in all the Central and District Jails
for wom~n and conduct an annual review of implememation of Model
Prison Manual 2016 - Remaining issues particularly those relating
to unnatural deaths in jails, adequacy of staff and training of staff
would be considered on next date of hearing - Constitution of India,
1950-Art.21 -
Cod~ of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - ss.436, 436A,
Model Prison Manual - Held: Is a detailed document
consisting of as many as 32 chapters that deal with a variety of
issues including custodial management, medical care, education of
G prisoners, vocational training and skill development programmes,
legal aid, welfare of prisoners, after care and rehabilitation etc.
H
Manual in case of juveniles - Notice issued to the Secretary,
Ministry of Women and Child Developme/1/ to prepare a manual in
respect of juveniles who are in custody either in observation Homes
1090
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
1091
or Special Homes of Safety in terms of Juvenile Justice (Care and
A
Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Simi/ Batra (Il) v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3
SCC 488: 1980 (2) SCR 557; Rama Murthy v. State of
Karnataka (1997) 2 SCC 642; T. K. Gopal v. State of
Kamataka (2000) 6 SCC 168: 2000 (3) SCR 1040 -
B
referred to.
1980 (2) SCR 557
(1?97) 2 sec 642
2000 (3) SCR 1040
Case Law Reference
referred to.
referred to.
referred to.
Para2
Para4
Paras
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No.
406 of2013
Gaurav Agrawal (A.C.) for the Petitioners.
Sushma Suri for the Respondent.
The Order of the Court was delivered by
MADAN B. LOKUR, J. I. Prison reforms have been the
subject matter of discussion and decisions rendered by this Court from
time to time over the last 35 years. Unfortunately, even though Article
21 of the Constitution requires a life of dignity for all persons, little appears
to have changed on the ground as far as prisoners are concerned and
we are once again required to deal with issues relating to prisons in the
country and their reform.
"
2. As far back as in 1980, this Court had occasion to deal with the
rights of prisoners inSu11il Batra (II) v. DelfliAd111i11istratio11.' In that
decision, this Court gave a very obvious answer to the question whether
prisoners are persons and whether they are entitled to fundamental rights
while in custody, although there may be a shrinkage in the fundamental
rights. This is what this Court had to say in this regard:
"Are prisoners persons? Yes, of course. To answer in the negative
is to convict the nation and the Constitution of dehumanization
and to repudiate the world legal order, which now recognises rights
1 < 1980) 3 sec 488
c
D
E
F
G
H
1092
A
B
c
D
E
F
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[20 I 6] I S.C.R.
of prisoners in the International Covenant on Prisoners' Rights to
which our country has signed assent. In Batra case,' this Court
has rejected the hands-off doctrine and it h

## Text

_Characters 0–39,908 of 55,082. This is a partial read: ask again with offset=39908 for what follows._

A
B
c
D
E
F
[20 I 6] I S.C.R. I 090
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
(Write Petition (C) No. 406 of2013)
FEBRUARY 05, 2016
[MADAN B. LOKUR AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.)
Prison reforms:
Present case pertaining to conditions of prisons in India - By
instant order this Court held: Prisoners like all human beings deserve
to be treated with dignity - To give effect to that, certain positve
directions passed - Undertrial Review Committee in every District
directed to hold meetings periodically and follow up the discussions
with appropriate steps for release of undertrial prisoners and
convicts - The Committee to also look into aspects pertaining to
effective implementation of s.436 and s.436A of C~P.C - Member
Secretary of State Legal Services Authority of every Stare directed
to ensure that an adequate number of competent lawyers are
empaneled to assist undertrial prisoners and convicts - Secretary
of District Legal Services Authority directed to look into the issue
of release of undertrial prisoners in compoundable offences - Jail
Authorities directed to ensure proper and effective utilisation of
available funds for improving quality living conditions of prisoners
- Ministry of Home Affairs to ensure that Management Information
System is in place at the earliest in all the Central and District Jails
for wom~n and conduct an annual review of implememation of Model
Prison Manual 2016 - Remaining issues particularly those relating
to unnatural deaths in jails, adequacy of staff and training of staff
would be considered on next date of hearing - Constitution of India,
1950-Art.21 -
Cod~ of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - ss.436, 436A,
Model Prison Manual - Held: Is a detailed document
consisting of as many as 32 chapters that deal with a variety of
issues including custodial management, medical care, education of
G prisoners, vocational training and skill development programmes,
legal aid, welfare of prisoners, after care and rehabilitation etc.
H
Manual in case of juveniles - Notice issued to the Secretary,
Ministry of Women and Child Developme/1/ to prepare a manual in
respect of juveniles who are in custody either in observation Homes
1090
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
1091
or Special Homes of Safety in terms of Juvenile Justice (Care and
A
Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Simi/ Batra (Il) v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3
SCC 488: 1980 (2) SCR 557; Rama Murthy v. State of
Karnataka (1997) 2 SCC 642; T. K. Gopal v. State of
Kamataka (2000) 6 SCC 168: 2000 (3) SCR 1040 -
B
referred to.
1980 (2) SCR 557
(1?97) 2 sec 642
2000 (3) SCR 1040
Case Law Reference
referred to.
referred to.
referred to.
Para2
Para4
Paras
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No.
406 of2013
Gaurav Agrawal (A.C.) for the Petitioners.
Sushma Suri for the Respondent.
The Order of the Court was delivered by
MADAN B. LOKUR, J. I. Prison reforms have been the
subject matter of discussion and decisions rendered by this Court from
time to time over the last 35 years. Unfortunately, even though Article
21 of the Constitution requires a life of dignity for all persons, little appears
to have changed on the ground as far as prisoners are concerned and
we are once again required to deal with issues relating to prisons in the
country and their reform.
"
2. As far back as in 1980, this Court had occasion to deal with the
rights of prisoners inSu11il Batra (II) v. DelfliAd111i11istratio11.' In that
decision, this Court gave a very obvious answer to the question whether
prisoners are persons and whether they are entitled to fundamental rights
while in custody, although there may be a shrinkage in the fundamental
rights. This is what this Court had to say in this regard:
"Are prisoners persons? Yes, of course. To answer in the negative
is to convict the nation and the Constitution of dehumanization
and to repudiate the world legal order, which now recognises rights
1 < 1980) 3 sec 488
c
D
E
F
G
H
1092
A
B
c
D
E
F
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[20 I 6] I S.C.R.
of prisoners in the International Covenant on Prisoners' Rights to
which our country has signed assent. In Batra case,' this Court
has rejected the hands-off doctrine and it has been ruled that
fundamental rights do not flee the person as he enters the prison
although they may suffer shrinkage necessitated by incarceration.
3. A little later in the aforesaid decision, this Court pointed out the
double handicap that prisoners face; the first being that most prisoners
belong to the weaker sections of society and the second being that since
they are confined in a walled-off world their voices are inaudible. This is
what this Court had to say in this regard:
"Prisoners are peculiarly and doubly handicapped. For one thing,
most prisoners belong to the weaker segment, in poverty, literacy,
social station and the like. Secondly, the prison house is a walledoff world which is incommunicado for the human world, with the
result that the bonded inmates are invisible, their voices inaudible,
their injustices unheeded. So it is imperative, as implicit in Article
2 I, that life or liberty, shall not be kept in suspended animation or
congealed into animal existence without the freshening flow of
fair procedure."
4. In Rama Murthy v. State of Karnataka' this Court identified
as many as nine issues facing prisons and needing reforms. They are:
(i) over-crowding;
(ii) Delay in trial;
(iii) Torture and ill-treatment;
(iv) Neglect of health and hygiene;
(v) Insubstantial food and inadequate clothing;
(vi) Prison vices;
(vii) Deficiency in communication;
G
(viii) Streamlining of jail visits;
(ix) Management of open air prisons.
2 ( 1978) 4 sec 494
H
'(I997)2SCC642
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
[MADAN B. LOKUR, J.]
This Court expressed the view that these major problems need
immediate attention, Unfortunately, we are still struggling with a resolution
of at least some of these problems.
5. Jn T. K. Gopa/ v. State of Karnataka' this Court advocated a
therapeutic approach in dealing with the criminal tendencies.of prisoners.
It was pointed out that there could be several factors that lead a prison.er
to commit a crime but nevertheless a prisoner is required to be treated
as a human being entitled to all the basic human rights, human dignity
and human sympathy. It was pointed out that it is this philosophy that
has persuaded this Court in a series of decisions to project the need for
prison reforms. This is what this Court had to say:
"The therapeutic approach aims at curing the criminal tendencies
which were the product of a diseased psychology. There may be
many factors, including family problems. We are not concerned
with those factors as therapeutic approach has since been treated
1093
A
B
c
as an effective method of punishment which not only satisfies the . ·
requirements of law that a criminal should be punished and the
D
punishment prescribed must be meted out to him, but also reforms
the criminal through various processes, the most fundamental of
which is that in spite of having committed a crime, maybe a heinous
crime, he should be treated as a human being entitled to all the
basic human rights, human dignity and human sympathy. It was
under thi~ theory that this Court in a stream of decisions, projected
the need for prison reforms, the need to acknowledge the vital
fact that the prisoner, after being lodged in jail, does not lose his
fundamental rights or basic human rights and that he must be
treated with compassion and sympathy."
6. In this background, a letter on 13'" June, 2013 addressed by
Justice R.C. Lahoti, a former Chief Justice oflndia to Hon'ble the Chief
Justice of India relating to conditions in prisons is rather disturbing. Justice
E
F
R.C. Lahoti invited attention to the inhuman conditions prevailing in 1382
prisons in India as reflected in a Graphic Story appearing in Dainik
Bhaskar (National Edition) on 24'h March, 2013. A photocopy of the
G
Graphic Story was attached to the letter.
·Justice R.C. Lahoti pointed out that the stpry highlights:
• (2000) 6 sec 168
H
1094
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2016] I S.C.R.
A
(i) Overcrowding of prisons;
B
c
D
E
F
(ii) Unnatural death of prisoners;
(iii) Gross inadequacy of staff and
(iv) Available staff being untrained or inadequately trained.
7. Justice R.C. Lahoti also pointed out thatthe State cannot disown
its liability to the life and safety of a prisoner once in custody and that
there were hardly any schemes for reformation for first time offenders
and prisoners in their youth and to save them from coming into contact
with hardened prisoners.
8. Justice R.C. Lahoti ended the letter by submitting that the
Graphic Story raised an issue that needed to be taken note of and dealt
with in public interest by this Court and that he was inviting the attention
of this Court in his capacity as a citizen of the country. We may say that
Justice R.C. Lahoti has brought an important issue to the forefront,
dispelling the view:
"Judges rarely express concern for the inhumane treatment that
the person being sentenced is likely to face from fellow prisoners
and prison officials, or that time in prison provides poor preparation
for a productive life afterwards. Courts rarely consider tragic
personal pasts that may be partly responsible for criminal behavior,
or how the communities and families of a defendant will suffer
during and long after his imprisonment."'
9. By an order dated S'h July, 2013 the letter was registered as a
public interest writ petition and the Registry of this Court was directed
to take steps to issue notice to the appropriate authorities after obtaining
a list from the office of the learned Attorney General.
I 0. In reply to the notice issued by this Court, several States and
Union Territories gave their response either in the form of
communications addressed to the Registry of this Court or in the form of
affidavits. It is not necessary for us to detail each of the responses.
G
Suffice it to say that on the four issues raised by Justice R.C. Lahoti
there is general consensus that the prisons (both Central and District)
~Decency, Dignity, and Desert: Restoring Ideals of Humane Punishment to Constitutional
Discourse by Eva S. Nilsen. Boston University School ofLaY.' Working Paper Series,
H
Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 07-33
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
[MADAN B. LOKUR, J.]
are over-crowded, some unnatural deaths have taken place in some
prisons, there is generally a shortage of staff and it is not as ifall of them
are adequately and suitably trained to handle issues relating to the
management of prisons and prisoners and finally that steps have been
taken for the reformation and rehabilitation of prisoners. However, a
closer scrutiny of the responses received indicates that by and large the
steps taken are facile and lack adequate sincerity in implementation.
11. In view of the above, the Social Justice Bench of this Court
passed an order on 13'h March, 2015 requiring the Union of India to
furnish certain information primarily relating to the more serious issue of
over-crowding in prisons and improving the living conditions of prisoners.
The order passed by the Social Justice Bench on l 3'h March, 2015 reads
as follows:-
"We have heard learned Additional Solicitor General and would
like information on the following issues: ·
1095
A
B
c
(i)
The utilization of the grant ofRs.609 crores under the 13th
D
Finance Commission for the improvement of conditions in·
prisons.
(ii)
The grant to the States in respect of the prisons under the
14th Finance Commission.
(iii)
Steps taken and being taken by the Central Government as
E
well as by the State Governments for effective
implementation.ofSection 436A of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973.
(iv)
Steps taken and being taken by the Central Government
and the State Governments for effective implementation of
F
the Explanation to Section 436 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 and the number of persons in custody due
to their inability to provide adequate security/surety for their
release on bail.
(v)
The number of persons in custody who have committed
G
compoundable offences and are languishing in custody.
(vi)
Steps taken. for the effective implementation of the
Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003._
We expect all the State Governments to fully cooperate
H
1096
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2016] I S.C.R.
A
with the Central Government in this regard since the matter
involves Article 21 of the Constitution and to furnish necessary
information within three weeks.
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
List the matter on 24th April, 2015."
12. In compliance with the aforesaid order, the Union of India
through the Ministry of Home Affairs filed a detailed affidavit dated 23"'
April, 2015. It was stated in the affidavit that all States and Union
Territories were asked to provide the information as required by this
Court but in spite of reminders and meetings, the information had not
been received from the State ofUttarakhand and the Union Territories
of Dadra & Nagar Have Ii, Daman & Diu and Lakshadweep.
13. It was stated that one of the problems faced in aggregating
the information that had been received was that management information
systems were not in place in a comprehensive manner. To remedy this
situation an e-prisons application was being designed so that all essential
data could be centrally aggregated. It was stated in the affidavit that a
draft project report was being prepared through a project management
consultancy so that an e-prisons application could be rolled out with
integrated information in all States and Union Territories comprehensively
for better monitoring of the status of prisoners, particularly undertrial
prisoners.
14. In response to the first issue, it was pointed out in the affidavit
in the form of a tabular statement that funds were made available under
the 13"' Finance Commission for the improvement of conditions in prisons
in respect of several States. We are surprised that no grant was allotted
in as many as 19 States and in the States where grants were allotted, the
utilization was less than I 00%, except in the State ofTripura.
IS. With regard to the grant under the 14'' Finance Commission,
it was stated that the 14'' Finance Commission had reported that the
States have the appropriate fiscal space to provide for the additional
expenditure needs as per their requirements. The 14'' Finance
Commission did not make any specific fund allocation in favour of the
Central Government but the States had projected their demands
- ·individually and the tabular statement in that regard is annexed to the
affidavit. As far as the Union Territories are concerned, apart from
Delhi and Puducherry none of the Union Territories had projected any
demand.
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRiSONS
[MADAN B. LOKUR, J.]
16. With regard to the third issue regarding effective implementation
of Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (for short the
Cr.P.C.), the affidavit stated that an advisory had been issued by the
Ministry of Home Affairs of the Government oflndia on 17'" January,
2013 to all the States and Union Territories to implement the provisions
of Section 436Aofthe Cr.P.C. to reduce overcrowding in prisons. Among
the measures suggested in this regard by the Ministry of Home Affairs
was the constitution of a Review Committee in every district with the
District Judge in the Chair with the District Magistrate and the
Superintendent of Police as Members to meet every three months and
review the cases ofundertri·al prisoners. The Jail Superintendents were
also required to conduct a survey of all cases where undertrial prisoners
h~ve completed more than one fourth of the maximum sentence and
send a report in this regard to the District Legal Services Committee
constituted under The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 as well as to
the Review Committee. It was also suggested that the prison authorities
should educate undertrials of their right to bail and the District Legal
Services c·ommittee should provide legal aid through empanelled lawyers
to the undertrial prisoners for their release on bail or for the reduction of
the bail amount. The Home Department of the States was also requested
to develop a management information system to ascertain the jail-wise
progress in tllis regard.
17. The aforesaid advisory dated 1 7'" January, 2013 was followed
up through a letter of the Union Home Minister to the Chief Ministers/
Lieutenant Governors on 3•• September, 2014. It was pointed out i.n the
letter that as per the statistics provided by the National Crime Records
Bureau (NCRB) as on 31 ".December, 2013 the number of undertrial
prisoners was 67 .6% of the entire prison population' and that the
percentage was unacceptably high. In this context it was suggested
that the provisions of Section 436 of the Cr.P.C. a~ well as Section 436A
of the Cr.P.C. had to be made use of. It was also suggested that steps
be taken to utilize the provisions of plea bargaining, the establishment of
fast track courts, holding of Lok Adalats and ensuring adequate means
for the productiOn of the accused before the Court directly or through
video conferenoing.
18. Yet another letter was sent to the Director General of Prisons
·· of all States/Union Territories on 22°• September, 2014 by the Ministry
ofHome Affairs drawing attention to the directions of this Court in Bllim
1097
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
1098
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2016] I S.C.R.
Sinf[h y. Union o_flndia dated 5"' September, 20146 relating to Section
436A of the Cr.P.C. and to take necessary steps to comply with the
orders passed by th is Court.
19. In a similar vein, yet another advisory was issued by the
Government of India on 27•h September, 2014. It was averred in the
affidavit that as a result of these advisories and communications, some
undertrial prisoners have been released in implementation of the
provisions of Section 436A of the Cr.P.C.
20. With regard to the fourth issue concerning the effective
implementation of Section 436 of the Cr.P.C., the affidavit stated that an
advisory was issued way back on 9'h May, 2011 in which it was pointed
out, imer alia, that prison overcrowding compels prisoners to be kept
under conditions that are unacceptable in light of the United Nations
Standard Minimum Rules far Treatment of Offenders to whil;h India is
the signatory. It was pointed that as per the statistics prepared by the
NCRB as on 31" December, 2008 prisons in India are overcrowded to
the extent of 129%. The advisory highlighted some measures.taken by
some of the States to reduce the number ofundertrial prisoners, including
their release under the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act,
1958 and encouraging NGOs in association with District Legal Services
Committees to arrange legal aid for unrepresented undertrial prisoners
as well as to implement the guidelines issued by the Bombay High Court
in Rajendra Bidkar v. State of Maharashtra, CWP No. 3 86 of 2004
(unreported decision).
21. With regard to the fifth issue relating to the number of persons
who have been languishing in jails in compoundable offences, a chart
was annexed to the affidavit which indicated, by and large, that quite a
few States had taken no effective steps in this regard particularly Andhra
Pradesh, Assam, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Kerala, Mizoram, Nagaland,
Odisha, Punjab, Rajasthan, Telangana, Tripura and Uttar Pradesh. The
reason why many undertrial prisoners had not been released was their
inability to provide security and surety for their release. The steps taken
to have these prisoners released from custody were not indicated in the
affidavit.
22. With regard to the effective implementation of the Repatriation
of Prisoners Act, 2003 it was stated that agreements on transfer of
6 MANU/SC/0786/2014
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
[MADAN B. LOKUR, J.]
sentenced persons have been bilaterally signed with 25 countries but the
agreements are operational after ratification by both sides only with
respect to I 8 countries. In addition, transfer arrangements have been
made with I 9 countries under the Inter-American Convention on Serving
Criminal Sentences Abroad thereby making the total number of countries
with which transfer arrangements have been made for prisoners to 37
countries.
23. Keeping in view the affidavit dated 23" April, 2015 filed by
the Ministry of Home Affairs and the somewhat lukewarm response of
the States and Union Territories, the Social Justice Bench passed the
following directions on 24'" April, 2015:
"We have perused the affidavit filed by the Ministry of Home
Affairs on 23rd April, 2015 and have heard learned counsel.
The admitted position is 67% of all the prisoners in jails are
under trial prisoners. This is an extremely high percentage and
the number of such prisoners is said to be about 2, 78,000 as on
3 Jst December, 2013.
Keeping this in mind and the various suggestions that have
been made in the affidavit, we are of the view that the following
directions need to be issued:
I.
2.
3.
A Priso·ners Management System (a sort of Management
Information System) has been in use in Tihar Jail for quite
some time, as stated in the affidavit. The Ministry of Home
Affairs should carefully study this application software and
get back to us on the next date of hearing with any
suggestions or modifications in this regard, so that the
software can be improved and then deployed in other jails
all over the country, if necessary.
We would like the assistance of the National Legal Services
Authority (NALSA) in this matter of crucial importance
concerning prisoners in the country. We direct the Member
Secretary ofNALSA to appoint a senior judicial .officer as
the nodal officer to assist us and deal with the issues that
have arisen in this case.
For the purpose of implementation of Section 436A of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "the Code"),
1099
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
1100
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
4.
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
(2016] I S.C.R.
the Ministry of Home Affairs has issued an Advisory on
17th January, 2013. One of the requirements of the Advisory
is that an Under Trial Review Committee should be set up
in every district. The composition of the Und.erTrial Review
Committee is the DistrictJudge, as Chairperson, the District
Magistrate and the District Superintendent of Police as
members.
The Member Secretary ofNALSA will, in coordination with
the State Legal Services Authority and the Ministry of Home
Affairs, urgently ensure that such an Under Trial Review
Committee is established in every District, within one month.
The next meeting of each such Committee should be held
on or about 30th June, 2015.
In the meeting to be held on or about 30th June, 2015, the
Under Trial Review Committee should consider the cases
of all under trial prisoners who are entitled to the benefit of
Section 436Aofthe Code. The Ministry of Home Affairs
has indicated that in case of multiple offences having
different periods of incarceration, a prisoner should be
released after half the period of incarceration is undergone
for the offence with the greater punishment. In our opinion,
.while this may be the requirement of Section 436A of the
Code, it will be appropriate ifin a case of multiple offences,
a review is conducted after half the sentence of the lesser
offence is completed by the under trial prisoner. It is not
necessary or compulsory that an under trial prisoner must
remain in custody for at least half the period of his maximum
sentence only because the trial has not been completed in
time.
5.
The Bureau of Police Research and Development had
circulated a Model Prison Manual in 2003, as stated in the
affidavit. About 12 years have gone by and since then there
has been a huge change in circumstances and availability
of technology. We direct the Ministry of Home Affairs to
· ensure .that the Bureau of Police Research and
Development undertakes a review of the Model Prison
Manual within a period of three months. We are told that a
review has already commenced. We expect it to be
completed within three months.
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS JN 1382 PRISONS
[MADAN B. LOKUR, J.]
1101
6.
The Member Secretary ofNALSA should issue directions
A
to the State Legal Services Authorities to urgently take up
cases of prisoners who are unable to. furnish bail and are
stm in custody for that re.ason. From the figures that have
been annexed to the affidavit filed by the Ministry, we find
that there are a large number of such prisoners who are
B
continuing in custody only because of their poverty. This is·
certainly not the spirit of the law and poverty cannot be a
ground for incarcerating a person. As per the figures
provided by the Ministry of Home Affairs, in the State of
Uttar Pradesh, there are as many as 530 such persons.
The State Legal Services Authorities should instruct the
C
panel lawyers to urgently meet such prisoners, discuss the
7.
case with them and move appropriate applications before
the appropriate court for release of such persons unless
they are required in custody for some other purposes.
There are a large number of compoundable offences for
which persons are in custody. No attempt seems to have
been made to compound those offences ·and instead the
alleged offender has been incarcerated. The State Legal
Services Authorities are directed, through the Member
Secretary ofNALSA to urgently take up the issue with the
panel lawyers so that wherever the offences can be
compounded, immediate steps should be taken and
wherever the offences cannot be compounded, efforts
should be made to expedite th~ disposal of those cases or
at least efforts should be made to have the persons in custody
released therefrom at the earliest.
·
A copy of this order be given immediately to the Member
Secretary, NALSA for compliance.
List the matter on 7th August, 2015 for further directions
and updating the progress made.
For the present, the presence of learned counsel for the
States and Union Territories is not necessary. Accordingly, their
presence is dispensed with."
24. The order dated 24"' April, 2015 made a pointed reference to
the extremely high percentage of undertrial prisoners and the total number
D
E
F
G
H
1102
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2016] I S.C.R.
A
of prisoners as on 31" December, 2013.
25. Reference was also made to the fact that the Bureau of Police
Research and Development had circulated a Model Prison Manual in
2003 but since about 12 years had gone by, the Ministry of Home Affairs
was directed to ensure that the Bureau of Police Research and
B Development undertakes a review of the Model Prison Manual within a
period of three months.
26. Directions were also issued for the assistance of the National
Legal Services Authority (NALSA) to assist the Social Justice Bench
and deal with the issues that had arisen in the case.
C
27. A direction was also issued to ensure that the Under Trial
Review Committee is established within one month in all districts and
the next meeting of that Committee in each district should be held on or
about 30•h June, 2015. NALSA was required to take up the issue of
undertrial prisoners particularly in the State of Uttar Pradesh where as
D many as 530 persons were in custody only because of their poverty.
E
F
G
28. Pursuant to the aforesaid order and directions, NALSA filed
a compliance report on 4'h August, 2015 in which it was stated that steps
have been taken to ensure that Under Trial Review Committees are set
up in every district and the State Legal Services Authorities had also
been asked to take up the cases of prisoners who were unable to furnish
bail bonds and to move appropriate applications on their behalf.
29. The compliance report stated that with regard to the Prisoners
Management System, the MinistryofHomeAffairs had already appointed
a project management consultant to prepare a detailed project report for
thee-Prisons project. It was stated that there were four prison software
applications that had been developed by (i) National Informatics Centre
(ii) Goa Electronic Ltd. (iii) Gujarat Government through TCS and (iv)
Phoenix for Prison Management System in Haryana. The various
applications would be evaluated and discussed in a conference of the
Director General (Prisons)/lnspector General (Prisons) to be held on
2o•h August, 2015.
30. The compliance report also indicated a break-up of the meetings
of the Under Trial Review Committees that had been set up in the various
States and that reports of the meeting that were directed to be held on or
about 30'h June, 2015 were still awaited from a few States and Union
H Territories.
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
[MADAN B. LOKUR, J.]
3 I. As regards the Model Prison Manual it was submitted that a
draft had been prepared and was circulated for comments and a further
meeting was scheduled to be held in August, 20 I 5 to finalize the draft.
32. With regard to the cases· of undertrial prisoners who were
unable to furnish bail bonds it was stated that as many as 3470 such
persons were in custody due to their inability to furnish bail bonds and a
maximum number of such undertrial prisoners were in the State of
Maharashtra, that is, 797 undertrial prisoners. It was stated that as
many as 3278 undertrial prisoners were those who were involved in
compoundable offences and efforts were being made to expedite the
disposal of their cases.
33. Keeping in view the compliance report as well as some of the
gaps that appeared necessary to be filled up, the Social Justice Bench
passed an order dated 7'h August, 2015 requiring, inter alia. the Under
Trial Review Committee to include the Secretary of the District Legal
Services Committee as one of the members of the Review Committee.
The Ministry of Home Affairs was directed to issue an appropriate order
in this regard.
34. With regard to the Model Prison Manual, it was suggested to
the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Union
oflndia that the composition of the Committee looking into the Model
Prison Manual should be a multicdisciplinary body involving members
from civil society and NGOs as well as other experts. It was also directed
thatthe Model Prison Manual should look into providing a creche for the
children of prisoners.
35. With regard to the large number ofundertrial prisoners in the
State of Maharashtra, it was directed that the matter should be reviewed
and an adequate number of legal aid lawyers may be appointed so that
necessary steps could be taken with regard to the release of undertrial
prisoners in accordance with law, particularly those who had been granted
bail but were unable to furnish the bail bond due to their poverty.
The order dated 7•h August, 2015 reads as follows:-
"We have gone through the compliance report filed on behalf
ofNALSA and we appreciate the work done by NALSA within
the time frame prescribed.
We find from the report that the Under Trial Review
1103
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
1104
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
(2016] I S.C.R.
Committees have been established in large number of districts but
they have not been established in all the districts across the country.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Goel, Director, NALSA - the nodal officer
will look into the matter and ensure that, wherever necessary, the
Under Trial Review Committee should be established and should
meet regularly.
We are told that the Under Trial Review Committee consists
of the District Judge, the Superintendent of Police and the District
Magistrate. Since the issues pertaining to under trial prisoners are
also of great concern of the District Legal Services Authorities,
we direct that the Under Trial Review committee should also have
the Secretary of the District Legal Services Authority as one of
the members of the Committee. The Ministry of Home Affairs
will issue a necessary order in this regard to the Superintendent
of Police to associate the Secretary of the District Legal Services
Authority in such meetings.
It is stated that so far as a software for the prisoners is
concerned, the Ministry of Home Affairs has appointed a Project
Management Consultant and at present there are four kinds of
software in existence in the country with regard to prison
management. It is stated that a meeting will be held on 20"' August,
2015 with the Director General (Prisons)/Inspector General
(Prisons) to evaluate the existing application software.
We expect an early decision in the matter and early
implementation of the decision that is taken.
It is stated that a Model Prison Manual is being looked
into since.the earlier Manual was of considerable vintage. We are
told that a meeting is likely to be held towards the end of this
month to finalize the Model Prison Manual.
Learned ASG is unable to inform us about the composition
of the Committee that is looking into the Model Prison Manual.
We have suggested to him (and this suggestion has been accepted)
that a multi-disciplinary body including members from Civil Society,
NGOs concerned with under trial prisoners as also experts from
some other disciplines, including academia and whose assistance
would be necessary, should also be associated in drafting the
comprehensive Model Prison Manual.
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
[MADAN B. LOKUR, J.]
To the extent possible, the Model Prison Manual should be
finalized at the earliestand preferably within a month or two, but
after having extensive and intensive consultations with a multidisciplinary body as above.
In the Model Prison Manual, the Ministry of Home Affairs
should also look into the possibility of having a creche for the
children of prisoners, particularly women prisoners as it exists in
Tihar Jail.
We find that the number of under trial prisoners in the State
of Maharashtra is extremely large and we also think that there
are not adequate number of legal aid lawyers to look into the
grievances of under trial prisoner. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Goel,
Director, NALSA says on behalf ofNALSA that necessary steps
will be taken to appoint adequate number of legal aid lawyers so
that necessary steps can be taken with regard to the release of
under trial prisoners in accordance with law including those who
have been granted bail but are unable to furnish the bail bond.
List the matter on 18th September, 2015."
36. When the matter was taken up by the Social Justice Bench on
J 81h September, 2015, Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Advocate was appointed as
Amicus Curiae to assist the Social Justice Bench.
37. On that date, the learned Additional Solicitor General informed
the Social Justice Bench that the Ministry of Home Affairs had duly
written to the Directors General of all the States and Union Territories
to ensure that the Secretary of the District Legal Services Committee is
included as a member in the Under Trial Review Committee. The learned
Additional Solicitor General also informed that the Model Prison Manual
was likely to be made available sometime in the middle of December,
2015.
38. It was pointed out on behalfofNALSA by Mr. Rajesh Kumar
Goel that some clarity was required with respect to paragraph 4 of the
order dated 24" April, 2015. In view of this request, it was clarified that
there is no mandate that a person who has completed half the period of
sentence, in the case of multiple offences, should be released .. This was
entirely for the Under Trial Review Committee to decide and there was
no direction given for release in this regard.
1105
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
1106
SUPREME <. •URT REPORTS
[2016] I S.C.R.
A
39. With regard to the large number of undertrial prisoners in
Maharashtra who were entitled to bai I, it was submitted that out of 797
such undertrial prisoners nearly 503 had been released and that steps
were being taken with regard to the remaining undertrial prisoners.
40. The order passed by the Social Justice Bench on 18'"
B
September, 2015 reads as follows:-
c
D
E
F
G
H
"This petition pertains to what has been described as
inhuman conditions in 13 82 prisons across the country.
On our request, Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Advocate has agreed
to assist us in the matter as Amicus Curiae since the complaint
was received by Post. The Registry should give a copy each of
all the documents in this matter to Mr. Gaurav Agrawal.
Learned Additional Solicitor General has drawn our attention
to the order dated 7th August, 2015 and in compliance thereof he
has stated that the Ministry of Home Affairs has written to the
Directors General ofall the States/Union Territories on 14th August,
2015 to ensure that the Secretary of the District Legal Services
Committee is included as a member in the Under Trial Review
Committee. A similar letter was written by NALSA on I Ith August,
2015. NALSA should follow up on this and ensure that it is
effectively represented in the Under Trial Review Committee.
It is not yet clear whether the Under Trial Review
Committee has been set up in every District. Learned Additional
Solicitor General and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Goel, Director, NALSA
will look into this and let us know the progress on the next date of
hearing.
As far as the software for Prison Management is
concerned, it is stated by the learned Additional Solicitor General
that all the Directors General of Police have been asked to intimate
which of the four available software is acceptable to them. He
further states that the software will be integrated on the cloud so
that all information can be made available regardless of which
software is being utilized. He expects the needful to be done within
a period of about two months.
We expect the Directors General of Police in every State/
Union Territory to respond expeditiously to any request made by
the Ministry of Home Affairs in this regard.
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
[MADAN B. LOKUR, J.]
With regard to the Model Prison Manual of 2003, it is
stated by the learned Additional Solicitor General that meetings
have been held in this regard and it is expected that the Model
Prison Manual will be made available by sometime in the middle
of December, 2015. He states that people from academia as well
as NGOs are associated in the project. It is expected that the
Prison Manual will also take care of establishing a creche in respect
of women prisoners who have children.
With regard tci the release of under trial prisoners,
particularly in the States of Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra, as
mentioned in ourorder dated 24th April, 2015, learned Additional
Solicitor General says that at the present moment he does not
have any instructions in this regard, but the Ministry of Home
Affairs will write to the State Governments/Union Territories to
take urgent steps in terms of our orders.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Goel, Director, NALSA says that legal
. aid lawyers have been instructed to take steps for the possible
release of under trial prisoners in accordance with law.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Goel has also drawn our attention to
paragraph 4 of the order dated 24th April, 2015. We make it clear
thatthere is no mandate that a person who has completed half the
period of his sentence, in the case of multiple offences, should be
released. This is entirely for the Under Trial Review Committee
and the competent authority to decide and there is absolutely no
direction given by this Court for release of such under trials. Their
case will have to be considered by the Under Trial Review
Committee and the competent authority in accordance with law.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Goel, Director, NALSA says that steps
are being taken to appoint an adequate number of panel lawyers.
1107
A
B
c
D
E
F
With reference to the release of under trial prisoners, he
says that in the State of Maharashtra, as per the information
available, 797 under trial prisoners were entitled to bail and with
G
the efforts of the State Legal Services Authority, nearly 503 have
since been released. Steps are being taken with regard to the
remaining under trial prisoners.
Mr.