# UNION OF lNDIA AND ORS v. DHARMA PAL AND ORS. ETC

- **Citation:** [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1056
- **Court:** Supreme Court of India
- **Decided:** 1996-03-29
- **Case number:** Civil Appeal No. 7062 of 1996
- **Bench:** K. Ramaswamy, G.B. Pattanaik
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/supreme-court-of-india/union-of-lndia-and-ors-v-dharma-pal-and-ors-etc-13969
- **Pages:** 5

## Headnote

Labour Law:
lndust1ial Di.1putes Act, 1947/Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 :
C
Casual Labow·e1"/Daily wage worken-Regulmisation of-U11io11 Ter1ito1y of C/wndigarh-Work chmge employees/Ca.ma/ labourers/Daily wage
workers working in the Govenunent. Departn1ents for nzore than JO
year.'i'"-Schenze ji·anzed by tlze Govenunent for regula1isation approved and
directed to be ilnple111ented-E111ployees who are regula1ised would be entitled
D lo all (he regular payment at the scale of pay presc1ibed lo the Central
Govenunent e111ploye~Worke1:\' who are not regula1ised are entitled to niinimwn sa/aiy presc1ibed for the post-In addition to that they are also entitled
to 60% of the DA. at Punjab pattem-Procedure for retre11chment to be
followed in J"Cj]Ject of the worke1:f who are required to be retrenched.
E

## Text

A
UNION OF lNDIA AND ORS.
v.
DHARMA PAL AND ORS. ETC.
MARCH 29, 1996
B
[K. RAMASWAMY AND G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.j
Labour Law:
lndust1ial Di.1putes Act, 1947/Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 :
C
Casual Labow·e1"/Daily wage worken-Regulmisation of-U11io11 Ter1ito1y of C/wndigarh-Work chmge employees/Ca.ma/ labourers/Daily wage
workers working in the Govenunent. Departn1ents for nzore than JO
year.'i'"-Schenze ji·anzed by tlze Govenunent for regula1isation approved and
directed to be ilnple111ented-E111ployees who are regula1ised would be entitled
D lo all (he regular payment at the scale of pay presc1ibed lo the Central
Govenunent e111ploye~Worke1:\' who are not regula1ised are entitled to niinimwn sa/aiy presc1ibed for the post-In addition to that they are also entitled
to 60% of the DA. at Punjab pattem-Procedure for retre11chment to be
followed in J"Cj]Ject of the worke1:f who are required to be retrenched.
E
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7062 of
1996 Etc.
From the Judgment and Order dated 1.4.92 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh in 0.A. No. 276 CH. of 1989.
F
K. Madhava Reddy, P.S. Poti and M.R. Sharma, Kanwaljcet Kochhar, J.D. Jain, K. R. Nambiar, C.M Sharma, M.C. Dhingra and Anjani
Sharma for the appearing parties.
·+
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
G
Leave granted.
We have heard learned counsel on both sides.
Pursuant to the direction given by this Court the appellants have
-I -·
framed the scheme. Shri K.B. Sharma, Superintending Engineer, ConstrucH tion Circle No. 2, Chandigarh Administration has placed the same along
1056
U.0.1.v. DHARMAPAL
1057
with the additional affidavit. The Scheme has been approved by the Central A
Government. The .schc1ne reads as under :
For work charged eniployees :
"(i) All the works establishment (excluding office of Ministerial
Clerical and drawing cadres below the level of _junior Engineer),
engaged in the construction/execution of maintenance work, shall
be called 'Work Force'. The work force includes buildings, roads,
public health activities comprising augmentation of water supply,
canals, drainage, electrical and electricity etc. The 'work division'
shall he a unit for casual or daily wage work force and a 'circle'
for work charged establishment. Separate cadre and seniority list
for each category shall be maintained in the Division and Circle
as the case may be.
B
c
(ii) Workers engaged on jobs, which are likely to be of a short
duration, i.e., less than 240 days in a year, will be terminated on D
completion of work. No seniority list of such workers will be
required to be maintained.
(iii) Workers who have completed five. years service as on 31st
August, 1995 will be considered for Regularisation against the
available regular posts subject to the fulfilment of requirements as E
laid down in the Recruitment Rules for the post in question, if
they were recruited before 6.1.1992, the date on which a ban was
imposed on the recruitment of daily/casual workers.
(iv) Since a complete ban on recruitment of· work charged
casual/daily wage employees was imposed by Chandigarh Administration, those recruited in contravention o.f this policy
decision after this date, i.e., 6.1.1992 will be considered for their .
regularisation only on the assessment of justification/requirements
on the basis of norms approved for the continued nature of work
and attaching the specific approval of Home Department, Chandigarh Administration.
For Casual/Daily Wage1~
(v) Workers working as Casual labourers in works which have more
F
G
or less fixed period of completion will be eligible for payment of H
1058
A
B
c
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[1996] 3 S.C.R.
benefits as admissible to them under rules. However, they will not
be considered for regularisation automatically. Their requirement
has to be reassessed after commissioning the work. Thus, the
workers will be liable lo be retrenched on completion of works
except categories in limited numbers who are required for the
operation and maintenance of the completed works. In their cases
specific approval of the Home Department should be taken.
(vi) Daily wage employees who have completed 10 years or more
service as on 31.8.1995 shall be considered for regularisation w.e.f.
31.8.1995 on the availability of posts. Such employees shall be
entitled for minimum of the scale w.e.f. the date of their regularisation. On regularisation, these employees shall be liable for transfer
any where within the Engineering Department, U.T. Chandigarh.
(vii) In respect of all such daily wages employees, who have not
yet completed 10 years service, a special review should be carried
D
out at the level of Head of Department regarding their requirement.
E
F
(viii) In the case of those employees whose services are no longer
required and have been taken after 6.1.1992 and specific approval
of Home Department, Chandigarh Administration does not exist,
they may be relieved of their duties at the earliest possible."
Shri Poti, learned senior counsel has brought to our notice Jetter
dated January 4, 1996 addressed by the Joint Secretary, Personnel to all
the heads of the Departments in which it wa' stated that they were
examining the payment of the D.A., C.C.A. H.R.A. to all the daily wage
workers. By our order dated January 18, 1996, while quoting the above
letter that Shri K. Madhava Reddy, learned senior counsel when was
confronted with the same, had expressed his inability to respond to the
same. Consequently, we have directed him to obtain instructions in that
behalf. Shri Reddy has stated today that pursuant to that letter follow up
G actiorl' was taken by the appellants in their letter dated March 4, 1996
wherein the appellants had examined the impact of the direction issued by
the Administrative Tribuhal. It is stated that 3647 daily wage/casual
employees are now on the muster rolls. If D.A., H.R.A. and C.C.A. are
allowed at full rates it would\vork out at the approximate rate Rs. 8 crores.
H Therefore, direction seeking their approval has been sought from the
f
1,
U.0.1.v. DHARMAPAL
1059
Government of India. He stated that the Government of India was not A
willing to extend the same benefit though formal order has not been
corn1nunicated so far. The Government of India is willing to permit the
appellant to pay 60% of the amount of the minimum pay on par with
Punjab pattern. Instead of D.A., H.R.A. and C.C.A., appellants, therefore,
arc willing to continue to pay to the daily wage workers above 60'f,; subject
to the above scheme. Shri Sharma learned senior counsel appearing for all
the respondents in appeal arising out of SLP No. 27844/95 has brought to
our notice the provisions of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 and
Schedules 5 and 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
B
In view of the rival contentions, the only question is : whether the C
appellants would be permitted to proceed in the 1.ight of the scheme framed
by them or give direction to continue to pay, as directed by the Tribunal.
After giving due consideration to the respective contentions, we think that
the appropriate course would be to give approval to the scheme framed by
the appellants. In view of the settled law by recent decisions all the daily D
wage employees are required to be regularised in accordance with the rules
invoguc following the principles of rules of recruitment, reservations and
existence of vacancies. Admittedly, there is no rules operating in the field.
As a result, all of them have been continuing on daily wage basis. It is true
that CAT at Chandigarh had on earlier occasion directed to pay to 88 daily
wage employees D.A., H.R.A. and C.C.A. Instead of the repetition, we E
think that the scheine requires enforcement.
In view of the scheme now framed, the appellants are directed to
regularise all those who have completed the prescribed period of days, viz.,
240 days against the existing vacancies applying the rules of reservation in F
the order of seniority in the respective categories mentioned in the scheme.
Such regularised employees would be entitled to all the regular payment
at the scale of pay prescribed to the Central Government employees. Those
who could not be regularised are directed to be regularised in the order
of seniority as had when vacancies arise. Work would be continued to be
taken from them as long as the work exists. Even those who were engaged G
as daily wage/casual labour, who could not complete 240 days but were
required to be retrenched, the procedure prescribed for retrenchment
under the Industrial Disputes Act should be followed. A list of them in the
order of seniority should be maintained. Last-come first-go principle
should be followed in that behalf. As and when vacancies arise or need for H
1060
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[1996] 3 S.C.R.
A
the work arises, they should be called for work immediately without asking
them lo gel their names sponsored hy the Employment Exchange. The daily
\Vagc \Yorkers/casual \Yorkers \Vho arc not regularised and taken work from
lhcn1 arc entitled to mini1nu1n of scale of pay prescribed for that posl. In
addition to that, they arc also entitled to 60% of the D.A. at Punjab pattern
B
. C
which is being followed in all other cases. The payment to all the candidates
whose service arc regularised/continuing on daily wage/casual lahour shall
be calculated from one year prior to the date of filing of the application in
the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh. The appellants are
directed to pay the same within a period of four months from to-day.
The appeals arc accordingly disposed of. No costs .
R.P.
Appeals are disposed of.